These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29114634)
21. Rationale and methods of an observational study to support the design of a nationwide surgical registry: the MIDAS study. Vach W; Saxer F; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Overgaard S; Farin-Glattacker E; Bless N; Bucher HC; Jakob M Swiss Med Wkly; 2018 Nov; 148():w14680. PubMed ID: 30449017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. External validation of the Tyrolean hip arthroplasty registry. Wagner M; Neururer S; Dammerer D; Nardelli P; Kaufmann G; Braito M; Brunner A J Exp Orthop; 2022 Aug; 9(1):87. PubMed ID: 36042064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Joint replacement surgery in Ghana (West Africa)-an observational study. George A; Ofori-Atta P Int Orthop; 2019 May; 43(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 30680518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. State-Based and National U.S. Registries: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI), California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR), and American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). Hallstrom BR; Hughes RE; Huddleston JI J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Oct; 104(Suppl 3):18-22. PubMed ID: 36260039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A far-reaching Regulation for the Italian National Registry of Implantable Prostheses: a possible model for other health registries. Toccaceli V; Torre M Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2021; 57(2):132-137. PubMed ID: 34132210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Orthopaedic registries: the German experience. Jansson V; Grimberg A; Melsheimer O; Perka C; Steinbrück A EFORT Open Rev; 2019 Jun; 4(6):401-408. PubMed ID: 31210976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome. Lacny S; Bohm E; Hawker G; Powell J; Marshall DA Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):442-51. PubMed ID: 27037425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [German Total Ankle Replacement Register of the German Foot and Ankle Society (D. A. F.) - presentation of design and reliability of the data as well as first results]. Kostuj T; Preis M; Walther M; Aghayev E; Krummenauer F; Röder C Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Oct; 152(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 25313699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the effectiveness of hip and knee implant models used in Catalonia: a protocol for a prospective registry-based study. Arias-de la Torre J; Domingo L; Martínez O; Muñoz L; Robles N; Puigdomenech E; Pons-Cabrafiga M; Pallisó F; Mora X; Espallargues M J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):61. PubMed ID: 30791929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advantages and limitations of national arthroplasty registries. The need for multicenter registries: the Rempro-SBQ. Gomes LSM; Roos MV; Takata ET; Schuroff AA; Alves SD; Camisa Júnior A; Miranda RH Rev Bras Ortop; 2017; 52(Suppl 1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28971080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Summary of knee implant one, three, five, and 10-year revision risk reported by national and regional arthroplasty registries: a valuable source of evidence for clinical decision-making. Foster C; Posada C; Pack B; Hallstrom BR; Hughes RE EFORT Open Rev; 2020 May; 5(5):268-272. PubMed ID: 32509331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries. Allepuz A; Havelin L; Barber T; Sedrakyan A; Graves S; Bordini B; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25520414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar. Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The progression of end-stage osteoarthritis: analysis of data from the Australian and Norwegian joint replacement registries using a multi-state model. Gillam MH; Lie SA; Salter A; Furnes O; Graves SE; Havelin LI; Ryan P Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Mar; 21(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 23274101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries. Blömer W; Steinbrück A; Schröder C; Grothaus FJ; Melsheimer O; Mannel H; Forkel G; Eilers T; Liebs TR; Hassenpflug J; Jansson V Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):919-26. PubMed ID: 25957983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of the Italian fractures registry (RIFra): A call for action to improve quality and safety. Vicenti G; Bizzoca D; Pascarella R; Delprete F; Chiodini F; Daghino W; Casiraghi A; Maccauro G; Liuzza F; Boero E; Belluati A; Pari C; Berlusconi M; Randelli F; Bove F; Sabbetta E; Carrozzo M; Solarino G; Moretti B Injury; 2023 Mar; 54 Suppl 1():S58-S62. PubMed ID: 33077163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Arthroplasty registries and their contribution to the safety of patient care in joint replacement]. Heinz BC Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Jun; 52(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19412594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]