These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29114864)

  • 1. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    McCall L; Orloff AS
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S34-S56. PubMed ID: 29114864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Racism in Trump's America: reflections on culture, sociology, and the 2016 US presidential election.
    Bobo LD
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S85-S104. PubMed ID: 29114872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election.
    Bryden J; Silverman E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214854. PubMed ID: 30964900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in Mental Health Following the 2016 Presidential Election.
    Yan BW; Hsia RY; Yeung V; Sloan FA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Jan; 36(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 33128680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brazilian women in politics.
    Sanders TG
    UFSI Rep; 1987; (14):1-8. PubMed ID: 12315429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain.
    Kantola J; Lombardo E
    Eur J Polit Res; 2019 Nov; 58(4):1108-1128. PubMed ID: 31762553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equality of the sexes in Sweden under a new government.
    Mccrea JM
    Labour Soc; 1979 Jul; 4(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 12309568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Dwyer PC; Chang YP; Hannay J; Algoe SB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221754. PubMed ID: 31487304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining socioeconomic disparities in electoral participation: The role of health in the SES-voting relationship.
    Nelson MH
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 320():115718. PubMed ID: 36708609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender, religion and democratic politics in India.
    Hasan Z
    Third World Q; 2010; 31(6):939-54. PubMed ID: 20857570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The gender gap: differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation.
    Pratto F; Stallworth LM; Sidanius J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1997 Mar; 36 ( Pt 1)():49-68. PubMed ID: 9114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.