BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29115181)

  • 21. Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task.
    Enriquez-Geppert S; Konrad C; Pantev C; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):877-87. PubMed ID: 20188191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resisting recently acted-on cues: compatibility of Go/NoGo responses to response history modulates (frontal P3) event-related potentials.
    Freitas AL; Azizian A; Leung HC; Squires NK
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17241136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA; van Staveren AS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1660-71. PubMed ID: 11514249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attention and inhibition in children with ASD, ADHD and co-morbid ASD + ADHD: an event-related potential study.
    Tye C; Asherson P; Ashwood KL; Azadi B; Bolton P; McLoughlin G
    Psychol Med; 2014 Apr; 44(5):1101-16. PubMed ID: 23673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Response inhibition in borderline personality disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Groen G; Kiefer M; Buchheim A; Walter H; Martius P; Reiter M; Hermle L; Spitzer M; Ebert D; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2008; 115(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 17885723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: neural and behavioral data.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):914-21. PubMed ID: 19716425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.
    Yamaguchi M; Wall HJ; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():113-120. PubMed ID: 28535468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: a dual-EEG study.
    Ménoret M; Varnet L; Fargier R; Cheylus A; Curie A; des Portes V; Nazir TA; Paulignan Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():85-97. PubMed ID: 24157538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Executive control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Reuter K; Hermle L; Ebert D; Kiefer M; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2007; 114(12):1595-601. PubMed ID: 17610122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age-related processing strategies and go-nogo effects in task-switching: an ERP study.
    Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():177. PubMed ID: 26029072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study.
    Smith JL; Jamadar S; Provost AL; Michie PT
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 22885679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).
    Puffe L; Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184844. PubMed ID: 28910413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.
    Salisbury DF; Griggs CB; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 15203056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task.
    Liepelt R; Wenke D; Fischer R; Prinz W
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):366-75. PubMed ID: 21085984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Eroh J; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():285-93. PubMed ID: 25823764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.