100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29115677)
1. Applicability of 3D-dental reconstruction in cervical odontometrics.
Kazzazi SM; Kranioti EF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Feb; 165(2):370-377. PubMed ID: 29115677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of virtual femur measurement from CT scan.
Ismail NA; Abdullah N; Mohamad Noor MH; Lai PS; Shafie MS; Nor FM
J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Apr; 63():11-17. PubMed ID: 30825771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement and error rates associated with standardized data collection protocols for skeletal and dental data on 3D virtual subadult crania.
Corron LK; Broehl KA; Chu EY; Vlemincq-Mendieta T; Wolfe CA; Pilloud MA; Scott GR; Spradley MK; Stull KE
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111272. PubMed ID: 35316774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Virtual Surgical Simulation Combined With Digital Teeth Alignment: A Pilot Study.
Kim JH; Park YC; Yu HS; Kim MK; Kang SH; Choi YJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 75(11):2441.e1-2441.e13. PubMed ID: 28826784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Odontometric sex estimation on three populations of the Iron Age from Abruzzo region (central-southern Italy).
Viciano J; D'Anastasio R; Capasso L
Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):100-15. PubMed ID: 25285904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography.
Wang Y; He S; Yu L; Li J; Chen S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 22008300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between a new 2-dimensional digital on-screen tooth measurement method with direct measurements.
Sonbol HN; Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Saleh MW; Al-Bitar ZB
Saudi Med J; 2011 Sep; 32(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 21894350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of micro-computed tomography in tooth measurement.
Kim I; Paik KS; Lee SP
Clin Anat; 2007 Jan; 20(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16372341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the spatial orientation of human teeth using a virtual 3D approach.
Benazzi S; Fantini M; De Crescenzio F; Persiani F; Gruppioni G
J Hum Evol; 2009 Mar; 56(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 19167741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
