100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29115677)
21. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The reliability of human odontometric data.
Kieser JA; Groeneveld HT
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 May; 46(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 1962316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring pelvises in 3D surface scans and in MDCT generated virtual environment: Considerations for applications in the forensic context.
Abegg C; Hoxha F; Campana L; Ekizoglu O; Schranz S; Egger C; Grabherr S; Besse M; Moghaddam N
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Nov; 352():111813. PubMed ID: 37742459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Validity of tooth volume determinations using cone beam computed tomography].
Liu Y; Mah J; Xu TM
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 20140054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.
Sherrard JF; Rossouw PE; Benson BW; Carrillo R; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S100-8. PubMed ID: 20381750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models.
El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols.
Forst D; Nijjar S; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Secanell M; Lagravere M
Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):69. PubMed ID: 25534123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth.
Nguyen E; Boychuk D; Orellana M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e59-66. PubMed ID: 21803235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Individual tooth segmentation from CT images scanned with contacts of maxillary and mandible teeth.
Xia Z; Gan Y; Chang L; Xiong J; Zhao Q
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jan; 138():1-12. PubMed ID: 27886708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical Note: Guidelines for the digital computation of 2D and 3D enamel thickness in hominoid teeth.
Benazzi S; Panetta D; Fornai C; Toussaint M; Gruppioni G; Hublin JJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Feb; 153(2):305-13. PubMed ID: 24242830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproducibility and accuracy of measuring unerupted teeth using limited cone beam X-ray CT.
Sakabe J; Kuroki Y; Fujimaki S; Nakajima I; Honda K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17329580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automatic teeth axes calculation for well-aligned teeth using cost profile analysis along teeth center arch.
Kim G; Lee J; Seo J; Lee W; Shin YG; Kim B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 22287231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Compared to X-ray, three-dimensional computed tomography measurement is a reproducible radiographic method for normal proximal humerus.
Jia X; Chen Y; Qiang M; Zhang K; Li H; Jiang Y; Zhang Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27422405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of the anthropometric measurements of skeletonized skulls with corresponding measurements of their 3D reconstructions obtained by CT scanning.
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Kociemba W; Sroka A; Kulczyk T; Żaba C; Paprzycki W; Przystańska A
Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 26131560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measurement error in human dental mensuration.
Kieser JA; Groeneveld HT; McKee J; Cameron N
Ann Hum Biol; 1990; 17(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 2281943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
