149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29116058)
1. A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.
Jacobson MW; Ketcha MD; Capostagno S; Martin A; Uneri A; Goerres J; De Silva T; Reaungamornrat S; Han R; Manbachi A; Stayman JW; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025030. PubMed ID: 29116058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A nonconvex model-based combined geometric calibration scheme for micro cone-beam CT with irregular trajectories.
Li G; Chen X; You C; Huang X; Deng Z; Luo S
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2759-2774. PubMed ID: 36718546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geometric Calibration Using Line Fiducials for Cone-Beam CT with General, Non-Circular Source-Detector Trajectories.
Jacobson MW; Ketcha M; Uneri A; Goerres J; De Silva T; Reaungamornrat S; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Mar; 10132():. PubMed ID: 28989218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.
Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.
Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam CT orbits using fiducials with unknown placement.
Ma YQ; Reynolds T; Ehtiati T; Weiss C; Hong K; Theodore N; Gang GJ; Stayman JW
Med Phys; 2024 May; 51(5):3245-3264. PubMed ID: 38573172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. C-arm orbits for metal artifact avoidance (MAA) in cone-beam CT.
Wu P; Sheth N; Sisniega A; Uneri A; Han R; Vijayan R; Vagdargi P; Kreher B; Kunze H; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Lo SF; Theodore N; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(16):165012. PubMed ID: 32428891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auto calibration of a cone-beam-CT.
Gross D; Heil U; Schulze R; Schoemer E; Schwanecke U
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5959-70. PubMed ID: 23039634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-calibration of cone-beam CT geometry using 3D-2D image registration.
Ouadah S; Stayman JW; Gang GJ; Ehtiati T; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2613-32. PubMed ID: 26961687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geometric calibration of a mobile C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Cho YB; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2124-36. PubMed ID: 18561688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometry calibration method for a cone-beam CT system.
Yang H; Kang K; Xing Y
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1692-1706. PubMed ID: 28206667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust methods for automatic image-to-world registration in cone-beam CT interventional guidance.
Dang H; Otake Y; Schafer S; Stayman JW; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6484-98. PubMed ID: 23039683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.
Choi CJ; Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2444-2460. PubMed ID: 38394613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization for customized trajectories in cone beam computed tomography.
Hatamikia S; Biguri A; Kronreif G; Kettenbach J; Russ T; Furtado H; Shiyam Sundar LK; Buschmann M; Unger E; Figl M; Georg D; Birkfellner W
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4786-4799. PubMed ID: 32679623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic image-to-world registration based on x-ray projections in cone-beam CT-guided interventions.
Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1800-12. PubMed ID: 19544799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel calibration method incorporating nonlinear optimization and ball-bearing markers for cone-beam CT with a parameterized trajectory.
Li G; Luo S; You C; Getzin M; Zheng L; Wang G; Gu N
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30414272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical geometric calibration for helical cone-beam industrial computed tomography.
Zhang F; Yan B; Li L; Xi X; Jiang H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 24463383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An empirical method for geometric calibration of a photon counting detector-based cone beam CT system.
Ghani MU; Makeev A; Manus JA; Glick SJ; Ghammraoui B
J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(5):865-877. PubMed ID: 37424488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A generic geometric calibration method for tomographic imaging systems with flat-panel detectors--a detailed implementation guide.
Li X; Da Z; Liu B
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3844-54. PubMed ID: 20831092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct determination of cone-beam geometric parameters using the helical phantom.
Xu M; Zhang C; Liu X; Li D
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5667-90. PubMed ID: 25198790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
