222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29116344)
1. Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.
Nawi N; Mohamed AM; Marizan Nor M; Ashar NA
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29116344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
Tavares A; Braga E; Araújo TM
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement in the determination of preformed wire shape templates on plaster models and customized digital arch form diagrams on digital models.
Camardella LT; Sá MDSB; Guimarães LC; Vilella BS; Vilella OV
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):377-386. PubMed ID: 29501113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment?
Hadadpour S; Noruzian M; Abdi AH; Baghban AA; Nouri M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):870-877. PubMed ID: 31784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental measurements based on a three-dimensional digital technique: A comparative study on reliability and validity.
Liu J; Liu Y; Wang J; Zuo X; Wang X; Zhang Y; He H
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Apr; 124():105059. PubMed ID: 33508626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement of in vitro orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and digital models using Maestro 3D ortho studio software.
Rafiei E; Haerian A; Fadaei Tehrani P; Shokrollahi M
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 8(5):1149-1157. PubMed ID: 35719020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability.
Kiviahde H; Bukovac L; Jussila P; Pesonen P; Sipilä K; Raustia A; Pirttiniemi P
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):222-227. PubMed ID: 28659050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the OrthoMechanics Sequential Analyzer.
Talaat S; Kaboudan A; Breuning H; Ragy N; Elshebiny T; Kula K; Ghoneima A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 25636561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
