These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29116344)

  • 21. Accuracy and eligibility of Bonwill⁃Hawley arch form established by CBCT image for dental crowding measurement: a comparative study with the conventional brass wire and caliper methods.
    Wang XM; Meng WY; Wang WN; Huo YF; Xue H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3961-3972. PubMed ID: 37071219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
    Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment.
    Grewal B; Lee RT; Zou L; Johal A
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 27511915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The validity and reliability of an automated method of scoring dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate using the modified Huddart-Bodenham scoring system.
    Martin CB; Ma X; McIntyre GT; Wang W; Lin P; Chalmers EV; Mossey PA
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 27105652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
    Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
    Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners.
    Mack S; Bonilla T; English JD; Cozad B; Akyalcin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28863923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models.
    Darroudi AM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ongkosuwito EM; Suttorp CM; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28457278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - A retrospective clinical study.
    Lippold C; Kirschneck C; Schreiber K; Abukiress S; Tahvildari A; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():103-9. PubMed ID: 25917690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Reliability, Reproducibility and Validity of Digital Orthodontic Measurements Based on Various Digital Models among Young Patients.
    Park SH; Byun SH; Oh SH; Lee HL; Kim JW; Yang BE; Park IY
    J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32846984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
    Soto-Álvarez C; Fonseca GM; Viciano J; Alemán I; Rojas-Torres J; Zúñiga MH; López-Lázaro S
    Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans.
    Rogati G; Leardini A; Ortolani M; Caravaggi P
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Mar; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 33731179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
    Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.