181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29116615)
1. Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.
Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 29116615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel tests of capture by irrelevant abrupt onsets: No evidence for a mediating role of search task difficulty during color search.
Schmid RR; Ansorge U
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):667-684. PubMed ID: 36460927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.
Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1104-20. PubMed ID: 26854530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aging and involuntary attention capture: electrophysiological evidence for preserved attentional control with advanced age.
Lien MC; Gemperle A; Ruthruff E
Psychol Aging; 2011 Mar; 26(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 20973601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unexpected abrupt onsets can override a top-down set for color.
Folk CL; Remington RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1153-65. PubMed ID: 26030438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
Hilchey MD; Pratt J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional dwelling and capture by color singletons.
Ruthruff E; Faulks M; Maxwell JW; Gaspelin N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):3048-3064. PubMed ID: 32483661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention.
Kawahara J; Yanase K; Kitazaki M
J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23161003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the modulation of attentional capture by spatial attentional control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
Ishigami Y; Hamm JP; Satel J; Klein RM
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Dec; 223(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 23064790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
Cho SA; Cho YS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
