These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29116615)

  • 21. Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention.
    Leonard CJ; Balestreri A; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25285472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?
    Burgess E; Hauck C; De Pooter E; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):634-648. PubMed ID: 36207664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Re-examining attention capture at irrelevant (ignored?) locations.
    Prasad SG; Mishra RK; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):e57-e65. PubMed ID: 33856849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Onsets do not override top-down goals, but they are responded to more quickly.
    Wu SC; Remington RW; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 24596080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An effective attentional set for a specific colour does not prevent capture by infrequently presented motion distractors.
    Retell JD; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1340-65. PubMed ID: 26299891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
    Du F; Jiao J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture.
    Harris AM; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2305-21. PubMed ID: 26018643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 20436192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?
    Seiss E; Kiss M; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):703-17. PubMed ID: 19473304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional capture under high perceptual load.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.