These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2911693)

  • 1. Is reform needed in the book review process?
    White TJ
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):578-9. PubMed ID: 2911693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical book reviewing.
    Morton PY
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1983 Apr; 71(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 6860827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Writing a book review.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Sep; 51(9):685-8. PubMed ID: 20938606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is reform needed in the book review process?
    Hopper KD
    Radiology; 1989 Jun; 171(3):878. PubMed ID: 2717776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Book reviewing: keeping the audience in mind.
    Hill K
    Nurse Author Ed; 1997; 7(1):4, 7-8. PubMed ID: 9397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Book reviews in medical journals.
    Kroenke K
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1986 Jan; 74(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3947772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current status of biomedical book reviewing. II. Time lag in biomedical book reviewing.
    Chen CC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1974 Apr; 62(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 4826480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Book reviewers and book reviews: potential conflict of interest.
    Burd A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Apr; 62(4):446. PubMed ID: 19324324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Journal's book review policy.
    Dickstein ES
    N Engl J Med; 1983 Mar; 308(11):657-8. PubMed ID: 6828105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsibility of the editor for the contents of a book review.
    Weinman D
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 1969 Jul; 18(4):640. PubMed ID: 5795457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Apropos of a book review].
    González Enríquez J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1994 Dec; 103(20):799-800. PubMed ID: 7861841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Journal book review - and important form of scientific information].
    Elashov IuG
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1982 Feb; 27(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 7070242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part III. Duplication patterns in biomedical book reviewing.
    Chen CC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1974 Jul; 62(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 4471577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is a book review?
    Dreher MC
    Nurs Outlook; 1983; 31(1):64. PubMed ID: 6549835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comment on the book review of The Cartwright Papers in the NZMJ.
    Dow DA
    N Z Med J; 2010 Aug; 123(1321):103. PubMed ID: 20927166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Book reviews become publication reviews.
    Martin DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1291. PubMed ID: 3500623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lawrence's book review unfair to Hoffmann.
    Ezekowitz A; Dimarcq JL; Kafatos F; Levashina E; Ferrandon D; Hetru C; Imler JL; Reichhart JM
    Curr Biol; 2012 Jun; 22(12):R482. PubMed ID: 22720679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The book review: a significant educational resource.
    Cooper SS
    J Nurs Educ; 1974 Aug; 13(3):41-4. PubMed ID: 4152402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Book review by discussion: on the "Modern Nurse" by Fiujio Shibata].
    Nakajima K; Karashima S; Araki H
    Kango Kenkyu; 1974; 7(1):429-35. PubMed ID: 4548463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disclosing bias in book review.
    Bass A
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(6):1748; author reply 1748-9. PubMed ID: 18997241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.