These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29117016)

  • 1. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
    Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal deformity from top academic orthopedic institutions.
    Michel C; Dijanic C; Abdelmalek G; Sudah S; Kerrigan D; Gorgy G; Yalamanchili P
    Spine Deform; 2022 Nov; 10(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 35819724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disparities between English and Spanish in readability of online endodontic information for laypeople.
    Miguéns-Vila R; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Rodríguez-Lozano F; Varela-Centelles P; Seoane-Romero JM; Castelo-Baz P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Nov; 149(11):960-966. PubMed ID: 30219207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.
    Koo K; Shee K; Yap RL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Sep; 36(7):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 27794197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.
    Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):102. PubMed ID: 32503524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
    PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
    Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
    Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.