These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29117418)

  • 1. Keratoconus Screening With Dynamic Biomechanical In Vivo Scheimpflug Analyses: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Steinberg J; Amirabadi NE; Frings A; Mehlan J; Katz T; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 33(11):773-778. PubMed ID: 29117418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
    Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
    Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tomographic and Biomechanical Scheimpflug Imaging for Keratoconus Characterization: A Validation of Current Indices.
    Steinberg J; Siebert M; Katz T; Frings A; Mehlan J; Druchkiv V; Bühren J; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):840-847. PubMed ID: 30540367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.
    Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Roberts CJ; Lopes B; Morenghi E; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 27930790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus.
    Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera.
    Mercer RN; Waring GO; Roberts CJ; Jhanji V; Wang Y; Filho JS; Hemings RA; Rocha KM
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical assessment of healthy and keratoconic corneas (with/without crosslinking) using dynamic ultrahigh-speed Scheimpflug technology and the relevance of the parameter (A1L-A2L).
    Fuchsluger TA; Brettl S; Geerling G; Kaisers W; Franko Zeitz P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 29871966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Analysis of Subclinical Keratoconus With Normal Topographic, Topometric, and Tomographic Findings.
    Koc M; Aydemir E; Tekin K; Inanc M; Kosekahya P; Kiziltoprak H
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr; 35(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 30984982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
    Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.
    Herber R; Hasanli A; Lenk J; Vinciguerra R; Terai N; Pillunat LE; Raiskup F
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Scheimpflug Dynamic In Vivo Curve Analyses to Characterize Biomechanical Changes of the Cornea After Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus.
    Steinberg J; Frings A; Mousli A; Casagrande MK; Druchkiv V; Katz T; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 32(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 26812712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.