These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29117707)

  • 1. Susceptibility of iodine concentration map of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography for quantitative and tumor enhancement assessment.
    Hwang YS; Cheung YC; Lin YY; Hsu HL; Tsai HY
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Aug; 59(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 29117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Saab-Puong S; Iordache R; Muller S; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081907. PubMed ID: 23927321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
    Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement.
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Jeunehomme F; Muller S; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):397-404. PubMed ID: 15973130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
    Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Quantification Method for Breast Tissue Thickness and Iodine Concentration Using Photon-Counting Detector.
    Han S
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):594-603. PubMed ID: 25708894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
    Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography.
    Baldelli P; Bravin A; Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Gambaccini M
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4233-51. PubMed ID: 16912379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximizing Iodine Contrast-to-Noise Ratios in Abdominal CT Imaging through Use of Energy Domain Noise Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT.
    Leng S; Yu L; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
    Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 25860839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection.
    Lalji U; Lobbes M
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical and dosimetric characterisation of different Contrast-Enhanced digital mammographic systems: A multicentric study.
    Ghetti C; Ortenzia O; Pagan L; Golinelli P; Nitrosi A; Sghedoni R; Ravaglia V; Verzellesi L; Angelini L; Venturi G; Berardi P; Acchiappati D; Bertolini M
    Phys Med; 2024 Apr; 120():103334. PubMed ID: 38520889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography--initial experience.
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Taupitz M; Bick U; Winzer KJ; Hüttner C; Muller S; Jeunehomme F; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 12635010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower energy levels and iodine-based material decomposition images increase pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma conspicuity on rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT.
    Aslan S; Camlidag I; Nural MS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):568-575. PubMed ID: 30155698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
    Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.