These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29119095)

  • 1. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Cambiano AO; Janson G; Fuziy A; Garib DG; Lorenzoni DC
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):141-146. PubMed ID: 29119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
    Kinzinger GSM; Hourfar J; Lisson JA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 33651171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.
    Kırcalı M; Yüksel AS
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 31(4):103-109. PubMed ID: 30701219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
    Bozkaya E; Tortop T; Yüksel S; Kaygısız E
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31642688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
    Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.
    Ghosh J; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 8972811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
    Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.
    Patel MP; Janson G; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; de Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19268832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Pendulum appliance and the Jones Jig: A prospective comparative study.
    Shetty S; Maurya R; Raj HVP; Patil A
    Eur J Dent; 2017; 11(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 28932141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of unilateral molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance.
    Schütze SF; Gedrange T; Zellmann MR; Harzer W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 May; 131(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 17482078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.