These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29119313)

  • 1. The Effect of Emotional State on the Processing of Morphosyntactic and Semantic Reversal Anomalies in Japanese: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.
    Yano M; Suzuki Y; Koizumi M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Feb; 47(1):261-277. PubMed ID: 29119313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interplay between mood and language comprehension: evidence from P600 to semantic reversal anomalies.
    Vissers CT; Chwilla UG; Egger JI; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1027-39. PubMed ID: 23454263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective adaptation in sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Yano M; Suwazono S; Arao H; Yasunaga D; Oishi H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Apr; 74(4):645-668. PubMed ID: 33319641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-examination of Chinese semantic processing and syntactic processing: evidence from conventional ERPs and reconstructed ERPs by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Wang F; Ouyang G; Zhou C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0117324. PubMed ID: 25615600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence comprehension: An ERP study.
    Ding J; Wang L; Yang Y
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 26833049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: an ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction.
    Kim A; Sikos L
    Brain Lang; 2011 Jul; 118(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 21481924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphosyntax can modulate the N400 component: event related potentials to gender-marked post-nominal adjectives.
    Guajardo LF; Wicha NY
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():262-72. PubMed ID: 24462934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing.
    Mueller JL; Girgsdies S; Friederici AD
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 443(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 18674588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: evidence from P600.
    Vissers CT; Virgillito D; Fitzgerald DA; Speckens AE; Tendolkar I; van Oostrom I; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3521-31. PubMed ID: 20696180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.
    Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs.
    Hahne A; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 May; 13(3):339-56. PubMed ID: 11918999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the P600/SPS affected by the richness of semantic content? A linguistic ERP study in Swedish.
    Ericsson E; Olofsson JK; Nordin S; Rudolfsson T; Sandström G
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18190397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship of language and emotion: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension.
    Chwilla DJ; Virgillito D; Vissers CT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2400-14. PubMed ID: 20849229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ye Z; Luo YJ; Friederici AD; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1071(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 16412999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.