These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29120467)

  • 1. Electrophoretic cytometry of adherent cells.
    Su EJ; Herr AE
    Lab Chip; 2017 Dec; 17(24):4312-4323. PubMed ID: 29120467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface isoelectric focusing (sIEF) with carrier ampholyte pH gradient.
    Wang Z; Ivory C; Minerick AR
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Oct; 38(20):2565-2575. PubMed ID: 28722147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microfluidic preparative free-flow isoelectric focusing: system optimization for protein complex separation.
    Wen J; Wilker EW; Yaffe MB; Jensen KF
    Anal Chem; 2010 Feb; 82(4):1253-60. PubMed ID: 20092256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing Cathodic Drift during Isoelectric Focusing Using Microscale Immobilized pH Gradient Gels.
    Lomeli G; Herr AE
    Anal Chem; 2024 May; 96(21):8648-8656. PubMed ID: 38716690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joule Heating-Induced Dispersion in Open Microfluidic Electrophoretic Cytometry.
    Vlassakis J; Herr AE
    Anal Chem; 2017 Dec; 89(23):12787-12796. PubMed ID: 29110464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of dialysis membranes into a poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chip for isoelectric focusing of proteins using whole-channel imaging detection.
    Ou J; Glawdel T; Samy R; Wang S; Liu Z; Ren CL; Pawliszyn J
    Anal Chem; 2008 Oct; 80(19):7401-7. PubMed ID: 18754670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isoelectric focusing on microfluidic paper-based chips.
    Yu S; Yan C; Hu X; He B; Jiang Y; He Q
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Aug; 411(21):5415-5422. PubMed ID: 31317237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of isoelectric focusing with multi-channel gel electrophoresis by using microfluidic pseudo-valves.
    Das C; Zhang J; Denslow ND; Fan ZH
    Lab Chip; 2007 Dec; 7(12):1806-12. PubMed ID: 18030404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Droplet-based in situ compartmentalization of chemically separated components after isoelectric focusing in a Slipchip.
    Zhao Y; Pereira F; deMello AJ; Morgan H; Niu X
    Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(3):555-61. PubMed ID: 24292781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of separation length and voltage on isoelectric focusing in a plastic microfluidic device.
    Das C; Fan ZH
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Sep; 27(18):3619-26. PubMed ID: 16915565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IEF in microfluidic devices.
    Sommer GJ; Hatch AV
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Mar; 30(5):742-57. PubMed ID: 19260009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous analysis of dye-loaded, single cells on a microfluidic chip.
    Phillips KS; Lai HH; Johnson E; Sims CE; Allbritton NL
    Lab Chip; 2011 Apr; 11(7):1333-41. PubMed ID: 21327264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model of separation performance of bilinear gradients in scanning format counter-flow gradient electrofocusing techniques.
    Shameli SM; Glawdel T; Ren CL
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Mar; 36(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 25308774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating extracellular matrix influence on adherent cell signaling by cold trypsin phosphorylation-specific flow cytometry.
    Abrahamsen I; Lorens JB
    BMC Cell Biol; 2013 Aug; 14():36. PubMed ID: 23957395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polyacrylamide gel plugs enabling 2-D microfluidic protein separations via isoelectric focusing and multiplexed sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis.
    Liu J; Yang S; Lee CS; DeVoe DL
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Jun; 29(11):2241-50. PubMed ID: 18449857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In Situ Scatheless Cell Detachment Reveals Correlation between Adhesion Strength and Viability at Single-Cell Resolution.
    Mao S; Zhang W; Huang Q; Khan M; Li H; Uchiyama K; Lin JM
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2018 Jan; 57(1):236-240. PubMed ID: 29136313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Switchable pH actuators and 3D integrated salt bridges as new strategies for reconfigurable microfluidic free-flow electrophoretic separation.
    Cheng LJ; Chang HC
    Lab Chip; 2014 Mar; 14(5):979-87. PubMed ID: 24430103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing for continuous sampling and analysis of adherent cells.
    Xu C; Wang M; Yin X
    Analyst; 2011 Oct; 136(19):3877-83. PubMed ID: 21785798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-dimensional protein separation with advanced sample and buffer isolation using microfluidic valves.
    Wang YC; Choi MH; Han J
    Anal Chem; 2004 Aug; 76(15):4426-31. PubMed ID: 15283583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microfluidic immunodetection of cancer cells via site-specific microcontact printing of antibodies on nanoporous surface.
    Ng E; Hoshino K; Zhang X
    Methods; 2013 Oct; 63(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 24012763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.