These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29120680)

  • 1. A clinical evaluation of a transparent, absorbent, adhesive wound dressing.
    von Cramon L; Markowicz M; Nebendahl J; Buchinger-Kähler VC; Noah EM; Narwan M; Behrendt A; Pallua N; Steinhoff A
    Br J Nurs; 2017 Nov; 26(Sup20):S46-S53. PubMed ID: 29120680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
    J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
    Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical case-series evaluation of a superabsorbent dressing on exuding wounds.
    Hindhede A; Meuleneire F
    J Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 21(11):574, 576-80. PubMed ID: 23413497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.
    Barrett S; Callaghan R; Chadwick P; Haycocks S; Rippon M; Stephen-Haynes J; Simm S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 29424643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An observational evaluation of a new foam adhesive dressing.
    Merlin-Manton E; Greenwood M; Linthwaite A
    Br J Nurs; 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19; 24(15):S21-2, S24-7. PubMed ID: 26266560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series.
    Atkin L; Barrett S; Chadwick P; Callaghan R; Rippon MG; Rogers AA; Simm S
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):174-182. PubMed ID: 32160089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicentre, observational evaluation of the product characteristics of two absorbent foam dressings.
    Seckam A
    Br J Nurs; 2019 Jun; 28(12):S10-S17. PubMed ID: 31242114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of two absorbent silver dressings in a porcine partial-thickness excisional wound model.
    Bell A; Hart J
    J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):445-8, 450-3. PubMed ID: 18065021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydropolymer dressings in the management of wound exudate.
    Carter K
    Br J Community Nurs; 2003; 8(9 Suppl):suppl 10-6. PubMed ID: 14685964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling properties of a superabsorbent dressing in the management of patients with moderate-to-very high exuding wounds.
    Münter KC; De Lange S; Eberlein T; Andriessen A; Abel M
    J Wound Care; 2018 Apr; 27(4):246-253. PubMed ID: 29637822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings.
    Terrill PJ; Goh RC; Bailey MJ
    J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):433-8. PubMed ID: 18065019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical acceptability of a dressing with matrix technology: a multisite evaluation of acute and chronic wounds.
    Guthrie J; Potter R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 27523658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a liquid dressing for minor nonbleeding abrasions and class I and II skin tears in the emergency department.
    Singer AJ; Chale S; Taylor M; Domingo A; Ghazipura S; Khorasonchi A; Bienenfeld A
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 48(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 25456777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superabsorbent dressings for copiously exuding wounds.
    Faucher N; Safar H; Baret M; Philippe A; Farid R
    Br J Nurs; 2012 Jun 28-Jul 11; 21(12):S22, S24, S26-8. PubMed ID: 22875373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a polyhexanide and propyl betaine-based gel in the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Durante CM; Greco A; Sidoli O; Maino C; Gallarini A; Ciprandi G
    Minerva Chir; 2014 Oct; 69(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 25267019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Patient's comfort during cicatrization and wound protection process due to the use of Nobecutan plastic dressing administered by an aerosol].
    Rubio AM; Trigoso CS; Hernández NM
    Rev Enferm; 2009 Nov; 32(11):16-20. PubMed ID: 20069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.