These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29121076)

  • 1. Male group size, female distribution and changes in sexual segregation by Roosevelt elk.
    Peterson LM; Weckerly FW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187829. PubMed ID: 29121076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.
    Bonenfant C; Loe LE; Mysterud A; Langvatn R; Stenseth NC; Gaillard JM; Klein F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 May; 271(1542):883-92. PubMed ID: 15255042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of male age on patterns of sexual segregation in Siberian ibex.
    Wang M; Alves J; da Silva AA; Yang W; Ruckstuhl KE
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):13095. PubMed ID: 30166602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influences on food supply from elk abundance and precipitation early in the growing season.
    Williamson LH; Weckerly FW
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264941. PubMed ID: 35275962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seasonal and sexual variation in the diet and gastrointestinal features of the sika deer in western Japan: implications for the feeding strategy.
    Jiang Z; Hamasaki S; Takatsuki S; Kishimoto M; Kitahara M
    Zoolog Sci; 2009 Oct; 26(10):691-7. PubMed ID: 19832681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linking landscape-scale differences in forage to ungulate nutritional ecology.
    Proffitt KM; Hebblewhite M; Peters W; Hupp N; Shamhart J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2156-2174. PubMed ID: 27755722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual segregation of forage patch use: Support for the social-factors and predation hypotheses.
    Biggerstaff MT; Lashley MA; Chitwood MC; Moorman CE; DePerno CS
    Behav Processes; 2017 Mar; 136():36-42. PubMed ID: 28069490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.
    Ruckstuhl KE; Neuhaus P
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 Feb; 77(1):77-96. PubMed ID: 11911375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual variations in food quality and gastrointestinal features of sika deer (Cervus nippon) in Japan during winter: implications for feeding strategy.
    Jiang Z; Hamasaki S; Ueda H; Kitahara M; Takatsuki S; Kishimoto M
    Zoolog Sci; 2006 Jun; 23(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 16849842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing sexual segregation and aggregation: old ways are best.
    Bonenfant C; Gaillard JM; Dray S; Loison A; Royer M; Chessel D
    Ecology; 2007 Dec; 88(12):3202-8. PubMed ID: 18229854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females?
    Conradt L; Clutton-Brock TH; Thomson D
    Oecologia; 1999 May; 119(3):367-377. PubMed ID: 28307759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The length of growing season and adult sex ratio affect sexual size dimorphism in moose.
    Garel M; Solberg EJ; Saether BE; Herfindal I; Høgda KA
    Ecology; 2006 Mar; 87(3):745-58. PubMed ID: 16602303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore.
    van Beest FM; Mysterud A; Loe LE; Milner JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 20443990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal variation in site fidelity: scale-dependent effects of forage abundance and predation risk in a non-migratory large herbivore.
    van Beest FM; Vander Wal E; Stronen AV; Paquet PC; Brook RK
    Oecologia; 2013 Oct; 173(2):409-20. PubMed ID: 23552985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the Diets of Female and Male Red Deer: The Meaning for Sexual Segregation.
    Garcia F; Alves da Silva A; Ruckstuhl K; Neuhaus P; Coelho C; Wang M; Sousa JP; Alves J
    Biology (Basel); 2023 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 37106741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of sexual dimorphism in body size and mouth morphology on diet selection and sexual segregation in cervids.
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Gordon IJ
    Acta Vet Hung; 1998; 46(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 9704534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer.
    Post E; Langvatn R; Forchhammer MC; Stenseth NC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1999 Apr; 96(8):4467-71. PubMed ID: 10200285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.
    Steyaert SM; Kindberg J; Swenson JE; Zedrosser A
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 23461483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the Jarman-Bell principle at intra-specific level explain sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates? Sex differences in forage digestibility in Soay sheep.
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Pérez-Fernández E; Robertson E; Alvarez-Enríquez B
    Oecologia; 2008 Aug; 157(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 18481093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elk winter foraging at fine scale in Yellowstone National Park.
    Fortin D; Morales JM; Boyce MS
    Oecologia; 2005 Sep; 145(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 15965755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.