122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29121160)
1. Reproducibility of Dual-Microphone Voice Range Profile Equipment.
Printz T; Pedersen ER; Juhl P; Nielsen T; Grøntved ÅM; Godballe C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3369-3377. PubMed ID: 29121160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-Retest Reliability of the Dual-Microphone Voice Range Profile.
Printz T; Sorensen JR; Godballe C; Grøntved ÅM
J Voice; 2018 Jan; 32(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 28526459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech and voice range profiles of adults with untrained normal voices: methodological implications.
Sanchez K; Oates J; Dacakis G; Holmberg EB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Jul; 39(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 23590284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Dual-Microphone Voice Range Profile Assessment-Interrater Reliability.
Printz T; Godballe C; Grøntved ÅM
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 32081506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voice and speech range profiles and Voice Handicap Index for males--methodological issues and data.
Hallin AE; Fröst K; Holmberg EB; Södersten M
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Jul; 37(2):47-61. PubMed ID: 21888604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty of speech level parameters measured with a contact-sensor-based device and a headworn microphone.
Astolfi A; Castellana A; Carullo A; Puglisi GE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL496. PubMed ID: 29960427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of Clinical Audio Recording and Analysis Systems for Sound Intensity Measurement.
Maryn Y; Zarowski A
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015 Nov; 24(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 26161588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive phase calibration of a microphone array for acoustic holography.
Teal PD; Poletti MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2368-76. PubMed ID: 20370019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Measurement of Airflow Using Singing Helmet That Allows Free Movement of the Jaw.
Jiang JJ; Hanna RB; Willey MV; Rieves A
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):641-648. PubMed ID: 26365311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of speaking and maximum voice range measures in screening for dysphonia.
Ma E; Robertson J; Radford C; Vagne S; El-Halabi R; Yiu E
J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 16678387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vocal Loudness Variation With Spectral Slope.
Titze IR; Palaparthi A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 31940253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Voice Range Profile-A Shortened Protocol Pilot Study.
Rychel AK; van Mersbergen M
J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):682-693. PubMed ID: 34099353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-speaker and inter-speaker variability in speech sound pressure level across repeated readings.
Castellana A; Carullo A; Astolfi A; Puglisi GE; Fugiglando U
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2353. PubMed ID: 28464626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of the fiber optic versus the electret microphone in voice amplification.
Kyriakou K; Fisher HR
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013 Jan; 48(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 23317389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
