These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29121333)

  • 1. Is It Now Institutionally Appropriate for the Courts to Consider Whether the Assisted Dying Ban is Human Rights Compatible? Conway v Secretary of State for Justice.
    Hobson C
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):514-530. PubMed ID: 29121333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Courts to look again at assisted dying law.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2017 May; 22(5):252-254. PubMed ID: 28467248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulating Risk and Autonomy in Assisted Suicide: Conway V Secretary of State for Justice.
    Hobson C; Papadopoulou N
    Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):128-142. PubMed ID: 33914070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A discussion on the proposed assisted dying law.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2014 Aug; 19(8):408-10. PubMed ID: 25089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will the UK Supreme Court allow assisted dying?
    Griffith R
    Br J Nurs; 2015 Oct 22-Nov 11; 24(19):970-1. PubMed ID: 26500128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Omid Litigation: Should Courts Hear Oral Evidence When Determining the Proportionality of Section 2(1) of the Suicide Act 1961?
    Papadopoulou N; Hobson C
    Med Law Rev; 2022 May; 30(2):348-363. PubMed ID: 34636855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court judgment in Nicklinson: one step forward on assisted dying; two steps back on human rights: a commentary on the Supreme Court judgment in R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38.
    Wicks E
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 25398565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted suicide and human rights.
    Doherty M; Yeates V
    Law Teach; 2002; 36(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 15164742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician.
    Mullock A
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):621-4. PubMed ID: 25575506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Human Rights Perspective of Assisted Suicide: Accounting for Disparate Jurisprudence.
    Martin SS
    Med Law Rev; 2018 Feb; 26(1):98-116. PubMed ID: 28981864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Escaping the shackles of law at the end of life: R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin).
    Herring J
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 23598284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Donaldson v. Van de Kamp: cryonics, assisted suicide, and the challenges of medical science.
    Pommer RW
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():589-603. PubMed ID: 10183890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legislative technique and human rights: the sad case of assisted suicide.
    Tur RH
    Crim Law Rev; 2003 Jan; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 16538737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted suicide under the European Convention on Human Rights: a critique.
    Morris D
    Eur Hum Rights Law Rev; 2003; (1):65-91. PubMed ID: 15199936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fifty years on: against the stigmatising myths, taboos and traditions embedded within the Suicide Act 1961 (UK).
    Shaw JJ
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):798-810. PubMed ID: 21774275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Recent case law about the right to die].
    Bascuñán R A
    Rev Med Chil; 2016 Apr; 144(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 27401380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not?
    Alpers A; Lo B
    JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kevorkian v. Arnett.
    United States. District Court. Central District Court of California
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/1 Case of Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom, 16 July 2015, no. 2478/15 and 1787/15 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Mar; 23(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 27044173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dying with Assistance: The Call for an Inquiry, the Power of a declaration, the role of evidence.
    Papadopoulou N
    Med Law Rev; 2022 Feb; 30(1):81-109. PubMed ID: 34928381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.