These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29121888)

  • 1. Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis.
    Cecilio-Fernandes D; Medema H; Collares CF; Schuwirth L; Cohen-Schotanus J; Tio RA
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):192. PubMed ID: 29121888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.
    Muijtjens AM; Mameren HV; Hoogenboom RJ; Evers JL; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 10336757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based decision about test scoring rules in clinical anatomy multiple-choice examinations.
    Severo M; Gaio AR; Povo A; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 25053378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The don't know option in progress testing.
    Ravesloot CJ; Van der Schaaf MF; Muijtjens AM; Haaring C; Kruitwagen CL; Beek FJ; Bakker J; Van Schaik JP; Ten Cate TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 Dec; 20(5):1325-38. PubMed ID: 25912621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Rasch measurement to score, evaluate, and improve examinations in an anatomy course.
    Royal KD; Gilliland KO; Kernick ET
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(6):450-60. PubMed ID: 24431324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.
    Bhakta B; Tennant A; Horton M; Lawton G; Andrich D
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 15752421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing script concordance test scoring methods and items by difficulty and type.
    Wilson AB; Pike GR; Humbert AJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 24702549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving assessment practice through cross-institutional collaboration: An exercise on the use of OSCEs.
    Malau-Aduli BS; Teague PA; Turner R; Holman B; D'Souza K; Garne D; Heal C; Heggarty P; Hudson JN; Wilson IG; Van Der Vleuten C
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25782600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The study skills self-efficacy scale for use with Chinese students.
    Yuen M; Smith EV; Dobria L; Fu Q
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 19671989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric analysis of performance on categories of client needs and nursing process with the NLN Diagnostic Readiness Test.
    Dimitrov DM; Shelestak D
    J Nurs Meas; 2003; 11(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 15633777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using generalizability analysis to estimate parameters for anatomy assessments: A multi-institutional study.
    Byram JN; Seifert MF; Brooks WS; Fraser-Cotlin L; Thorp LE; Williams JM; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):109-119. PubMed ID: 27458988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of an extended clinical examination.
    Bouwmans GA; Denessen E; Hettinga AM; Michels C; Postma CT
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(12):1072-7. PubMed ID: 25683172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the ABILHAND handle manual ability in MS?
    Barrett LE; Cano SJ; Zajicek JP; Hobart JC
    Mult Scler; 2013 May; 19(6):806-15. PubMed ID: 23095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Rasch analysis to analyze performance on patient management problems.
    Juul D
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():190-4. PubMed ID: 3218855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Brief-BESTest Meet Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Requirements for Balance Assessment in People With Neurological Disorders?
    Bravini E; Nardone A; Godi M; Guglielmetti S; Franchignoni F; Giordano A
    Phys Ther; 2016 Oct; 96(10):1610-1619. PubMed ID: 27103223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.