These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29122191)

  • 1. Identifying interactive effects of task demands in lifting on estimates of in vivo low back joint loads.
    Gooyers CE; Beach TAC; Frost DM; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():203-210. PubMed ID: 29122191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does team lifting increase the variability in peak lumbar compression in ironworkers?
    Faber G; Visser S; van der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Hoozemans MJ; Van Dieën JH; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4171-3. PubMed ID: 22317361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical comparison between expert and novice manual materials handlers using a multi-joint EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2938-2945. PubMed ID: 27469898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of lumbar spine loads and kinematics in healthy and non-specific low back pain individuals during unstable lifting activities.
    Heidari E; Arjmand N; Kahrizi S
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111344. PubMed ID: 36270086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of spinal internal loads and lumbar curvature under holding static load at different trunk and knee positions.
    Kahrizi S; Parnianpour M; Firoozabadi SM; Kasemnejad A; Karimi E
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2007 Apr; 10(7):1036-43. PubMed ID: 19070047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of Spinal Loading During Manual Materials Handling Using Inertial Motion Capture.
    Larsen FG; Svenningsen FP; Andersen MS; de Zee M; Skals S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 48(2):805-821. PubMed ID: 31748833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting.
    Gagnon D; Larivière C; Loisel P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):359-72. PubMed ID: 11390042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.
    Gagnon D; Gagnon M
    J Biomech; 1992 Aug; 25(8):891-901. PubMed ID: 1639833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.
    Skotte JH; Essendrop M; Hansen AF; Schibye B
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 12231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.