These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29122198)

  • 21. The effects of social interactions with in-vehicle agents on a driver's anger level, driving performance, situation awareness, and perceived workload.
    Jeon M; Walker BN; Gable TM
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():185-99. PubMed ID: 25959334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Mate! I'm running 10 min late": An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():134-142. PubMed ID: 30343165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Driving distracted with friends: Effect of passengers and driver distraction on young drivers' behavior.
    Zhang F; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105246. PubMed ID: 31421453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.
    Large DR; Burnett G; Crundall E; Lawson G; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():184-196. PubMed ID: 31046950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of navigation display clutter on performance and attention allocation in presentation- and simulator-based driving experiments.
    Pankok C; Kaber D
    Appl Ergon; 2018 May; 69():136-145. PubMed ID: 29477321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; King M; Haque MM; Washington S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183361. PubMed ID: 28877200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models.
    Perrier MJR; Louw TL; Carsten OMJ
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 36259259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of police cruiser restraint cage configuration on shoulder discomfort, muscular demands, upper limb postures, and task performance during simulated police patrol.
    McKinnon CD; Amy SA; Callaghan JP; Dickerson CR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1414-21. PubMed ID: 24846838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distraction and task engagement: How interesting and boring information impact driving performance and subjective and physiological responses.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A; Simmons L; Maikala R
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():342-348. PubMed ID: 27633231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Good distractions: Testing the effects of listening to an audiobook on driving performance in simple and complex road environments.
    Nowosielski RJ; Trick LM; Toxopeus R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():202-209. PubMed ID: 29223795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of mobile data terminal use on posture and low-back discomfort when combined with simulated prolonged driving in police cruisers.
    Gruevski KM; McKinnon CD; Dickerson CR; Callaghan JP
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 24034884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling novice law enforcement officers' interaction with in-vehicle technology.
    Park J; Wozniak D; Zahabi M
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jan; 114():104154. PubMed ID: 37883912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: Evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual-manual distraction.
    Louveton N; McCall R; Koenig V; Avanesov T; Engel T
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():196-204. PubMed ID: 26851479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does wearable device bring distraction closer to drivers? Comparing smartphones and Google Glass.
    He J; McCarley JS; Crager K; Jadliwala M; Hua L; Huang S
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():156-166. PubMed ID: 29866306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An integrated measure of display clutter based on feature content, user knowledge and attention allocation factors.
    Pankok C; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):682-696. PubMed ID: 29099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Creating the environment for driver distraction: A thematic framework of sociotechnical factors.
    Parnell KJ; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():213-228. PubMed ID: 29409637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm.
    Hibberd DL; Jamson SL; Carsten OM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1096-103. PubMed ID: 22999382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing driver acceptance of technology that reduces mobile phone use while driving: The case of mobile phone applications.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Briant O; Kaye SA; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105348. PubMed ID: 31790969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional warnings caused by driver monitoring systems: How often do they appear and how well are they understood?
    Forster Y; Schoemig N; Kremer C; Wiedemann K; Gary S; Naujoks F; Keinath A; Neukum A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107684. PubMed ID: 38945045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.