246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29122199)
1. Tracking and discrete dual task performance for different visual spatial stimulus-response mappings with focal and ambient vision.
Tsang SNH; Chan AHS
Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():39-49. PubMed ID: 29122199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tracking and discrete dual task performance with different spatial stimulus-response mappings.
Tsang SN; Chan AH
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):368-82. PubMed ID: 25396283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory versus visual spatial stimulus-response mappings in tracking and discrete dual task performance: implications for human-machine interface design.
Tsang SNH; Chan AHS; Pan X; Man SS
Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):485-501. PubMed ID: 33103599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation on the effects of presentation modality for spatial signals on human performance using a dual task paradigm.
Kang SX; Man SS; Chan AHS
Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103898. PubMed ID: 36115134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.
Schaeffner S; Koch I; Philipp AM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():210-218. PubMed ID: 30312892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
Wahn B; König P
Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual perspective taking for avatars in a Simon task.
Böffel C; Müsseler J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 30187398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors.
Verghese A; Mattingley JB; Palmer PE; Dux PE
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 29043656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation.
Hahn M; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1414():66-76. PubMed ID: 21871612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
Stephan DN; Koch I
Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
Stephan DN; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults.
Fuhrman SI; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
J Vestib Res; 2015; 25(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 26410669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls.
Chan KW; Chan AH
Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 21390953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
