231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29122687)
1. Is anatomic acetabular orientation related to pelvic morphology? CT analysis of 150 healthy pelvises.
Sautet P; Giorgi H; Chabrand P; Tropiano P; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Blondel B
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):347-351. PubMed ID: 29122687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.
Thelen T; Thelen P; Demezon H; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 28025151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Two key describers of the sacro-acetabular relationships: the angles of sacral and acetabular incidence].
Tardieu C; Hecquet J; Boulay C; Montigny JP; Legaye J; Gagey O; Marty C; Duval-Beaupère G
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 18555858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrum pubic incidence and sacrum pubic posterior angle: two morphologic radiological parameters in assessing pelvic sagittal alignment in human adults.
Wang W; Wu M; Liu Z; Xu L; Zhu F; Zhu Z; Weng W; Qiu Y
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1427-32. PubMed ID: 24752624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic Characterization of Pelvic and Sacral Measures from 200 Subjects.
Veilleux NJ; Kalore NV; Vossen JA; Wayne JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Dec; 102(23):e130. PubMed ID: 32881722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy measurements of acetabular cup positioning using CT less navigation].
Blendea S; Troccaz J; Merloz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 Apr; 93(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 17401289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tilt-adjusted Cup Anteversion in Patients with Severe Backward Pelvic Tilt is Associated with the Risk of Iliopsoas Impingement: A Three-dimensional Implantation Simulation.
Ueno T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Ohmori T; Yoshitani J; Ueoka K; Tsuchiya H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 477(10):2243-2254. PubMed ID: 31169628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Change in acetabular version after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy to correct post-operative flat back: EOS® measurements of 38 acetabula.
Masquefa T; Verdier N; Gille O; Boissière L; Obeid I; Maillot C; Tournier C; Fabre T
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Oct; 101(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 26362041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacral orientation revisited.
Peleg S; Dar G; Steinberg N; Peled N; Hershkovitz I; Masharawi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E397-404. PubMed ID: 17621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component.
Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Jaramaz B; Amiot LP
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17487661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between sacral pelvic incidence and acetabular orientation.
Legaye J; Duval-Beaupere G; Barrau A; Boulay C; Hecquet J; Montigny JP; Tardieu C
Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 21279971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does hemipelvis structure and position influence acetabulum orientation?
Musielak B; Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():131. PubMed ID: 26984181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic Tilt Evaluation From Frontal Radiographs: The Validity, Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Parameter.
Ragsdale MI; Wong FS; Boutin RD; Meehan JP
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 28012720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique.
Oh KJ; Kim BK; Jo MI; Ahn BM
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018780755. PubMed ID: 29890935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction.
Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Musielak B; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():42. PubMed ID: 25887277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional analysis of acetabular cup orientation and an evaluation of the relationship with pelvic sagittal parameters.
Sahin A; Simsek ME; Gursoy S; Akkaya M; Isik C; Bozkurt M
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019861225. PubMed ID: 31284813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
