155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29123023)
1. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packs, numbered packs and pack inserts in Turkey: a focus group study.
Mucan B; Moodie C
Tob Control; 2018 Nov; 27(6):631-636. PubMed ID: 29123023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Packaging With Audio Warning Messages: A Focus Group Study in Scotland.
Mitchell D; Moodie C; Bauld L
Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 May; 22(6):984-989. PubMed ID: 31063185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adolescents' perceptions of standardised cigarette packaging design and brand variant name post-implementation: a focus group study in Scotland.
Mitchell D; Moodie C; Critchlow N; Bauld L
BMC Public Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):1227. PubMed ID: 31488096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation: a focus group study.
Moodie C
Tob Control; 2018 Jan; 27(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 28153959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.
Borland R; Savvas S; Sharkie F; Moore K
Tob Control; 2013 Mar; 22(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22166265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reactions to Standardized Cigarette Packs With Varying Structural Designs, and the Association With Smoking Susceptibility: A Postimplementation Cross-Sectional Survey With Never-Smoking Adolescents in Scotland.
Mitchell D; Critchlow N; Moodie C; Bauld L
Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 Oct; 22(11):2041-2050. PubMed ID: 32577739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Australia's introduction of tobacco plain packs on adult smokers' pack-related perceptions and responses: results from a continuous tracking survey.
Dunlop SM; Dobbins T; Young JM; Perez D; Currow DC
BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005836. PubMed ID: 25524542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Youth perceptions of Brand variant names on standardised cigarette packs, and responses to replacing these with numbers: a focus group study in Britain.
Mitchell D; Moodie C; Ford A; MacKintosh AM; Critchlow N; Bauld L
Drugs (Abingdon Engl); 2022; 29(5):528-535. PubMed ID: 36303721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.
Mutti-Packer S; Collyer B; Hodgins DC
BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1361. PubMed ID: 30526539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and dissuasive cigarettes among young adult smokers in the UK: a cross-sectional online survey.
Moodie CS; Hiscock R; Thrasher J; Reid G
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e019662. PubMed ID: 30185567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plain packaging: legislative differences in Australia, France, the UK, New Zealand and Norway, and options for strengthening regulations.
Moodie C; Hoek J; Scheffels J; Gallopel-Morvan K; Lindorff K
Tob Control; 2019 Sep; 28(5):485-492. PubMed ID: 30068563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal tobacco pack display before and after the introduction of plain packaging with larger pictorial health warnings in Australia: an observational study of outdoor café strips.
Zacher M; Bayly M; Brennan E; Dono J; Miller C; Durkin S; Scollo M; Wakefield M
Addiction; 2014 Apr; 109(4):653-62. PubMed ID: 24428427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plain packaging of waterpipe tobacco? A qualitative analysis exploring waterpipe smokers' and non-smokers' responses to enhanced versus existing pictorial health warnings in Egypt.
Mostafa A; Mohammed HT; Hussein WM; Elhabiby M; Safwat W; Labib S; Aboul Fotouh A; Hoek J
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e023496. PubMed ID: 30355793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
Lund I; Scheffels J
BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]