These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29123998)

  • 1. Feasibility of Dentascan in planning of implant surgery in posterior maxilla and mandible.
    Chandel S; Singh N; Agrawal A; Singh H; Nandakumar H
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(3):188-192. PubMed ID: 29123998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of the inferior alveolar canal and mental foramen on digital panoramic images.
    Pria CM; Masood F; Beckerley JM; Carson RE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22186861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of anatomical structures and variations in the maxilla and the mandible before dental implant treatment.
    Genç T; Duruel O; Kutlu HB; Dursun E; Karabulut E; Tözüm TF
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 30328299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomy of the jaw revisited with a dental CT software program.
    Abrahams JJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(4):979-90. PubMed ID: 8352174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DentaScan imaging of the mandible and maxilla.
    Yanagisawa K; Friedman CD; Vining EM; Abrahams JJ
    Head Neck; 1993; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8416849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
    Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lingual mandibular bony defects: CT in the buccolingual plane.
    Slasky BS; Bar-Ziv J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 8626908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior residual ridge resorption in patients wearing a mandibular implant-retained overdenture.
    Tymstra N; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jul; 38(7):509-16. PubMed ID: 21092056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
    Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
    J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DentaScan: a new diagnostic method for evaluating mandibular and maxillary pathology.
    King JM; Caldarelli DD; Petasnick JP
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Apr; 102(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 1556886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Location of the Mandibular Canal: Correlation Between Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Measurements.
    Bertram F; Bertram S; Rudisch A; Emshoff R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):129–134. PubMed ID: 29448262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dentascan computed tomography of the mandibular incisive canal. Its radiologic anatomy and the therapeutic implications].
    Calgaro A; Bison L; Bellis GB; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 10780211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: a comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography.
    Lindh C; Petersson A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 2639123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.