These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2912469)

  • 1. Comparison of the geometric and the contrast models of similarity by presentation of visual stimuli to the left and the right visual fields.
    Frost R; Gati I
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Jan; 9(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 2912469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity?
    Levine SC; Banich MT; Koch-Weser MP
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Dec; 8(3):303-25. PubMed ID: 3214588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli.
    Patterson K; Bradshaw JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 1202147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Order of feature recognition in familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Hines D; Braun JA
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Nov; 14(2):165-84. PubMed ID: 2285511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laterality effects in identification of caricatures and photographs of famous faces.
    Rhodes G; Wooding R
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Mar; 9(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 2923711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral differences in face processing: task and modality effects.
    Bruyer R; Stroot C
    Cortex; 1984 Sep; 20(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 6488814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between changes in hemispheric advantage during familiarization to faces and proficiency in facial recognition.
    Ross-Kossak P; Turkewitz G
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 6483173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upright and inverted faces: the right hemisphere knows the difference.
    Leehey S; Carey S; Diamond R; Cahn A
    Cortex; 1978 Sep; 14(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 710151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Hellige JB; Corwin WH; Jonsson JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Feb; 10(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 6242766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the nature of the left visual field advantage for faces.
    Anderson E; Parkin AJ
    Cortex; 1985 Sep; 21(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 4053630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information.
    Hellige JB; Taylor AK; Eng TL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):711-22. PubMed ID: 2531206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between damaged brain hemisphere and mode of presentation on the recognition of faces and figures.
    Krickl M; Poser U; Markowitsch HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(5):795-805. PubMed ID: 3431675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: the analytic/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing.
    Bradshaw JL; Sherlock D
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 7128171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing.
    Parkin AJ; Williamson P
    Cortex; 1987 Mar; 23(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 3568709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. About face: left-hemisphere involvement in processing physiognomies.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 6460075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interhemispheric differences in same versus different judgments upon presentation of complex visual stimuli.
    Magnani G; Mazzucchi A; Parma M
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 6483181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial neglect.
    Young AW; de Haan EH; Newcombe F; Hay DC
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(5):391-415. PubMed ID: 2377286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common and distinctive features of verbal and pictorial stimuli as determinants of psychophysiological responsivity.
    Ben-Shakhar G; Gati I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1987 Jun; 116(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 2955073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Barrett SE; Rugg MD; Perrett DI
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 3362336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.