These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29124717)

  • 1. Semantic ambiguity effects on traditional Chinese character naming: A corpus-based approach.
    Chang YN; Lee CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2292-2304. PubMed ID: 29124717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.
    Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision.
    Chang YN; Lee CY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32789580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?
    Cevoli B; Watkins C; Rastle K
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):247-263. PubMed ID: 32666392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
    Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming.
    Chang YN; Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Chen CL; Lee CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 25630311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of semantic diversity and word frequency on single word processing.
    Chapman CA; Martin RC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1035-1068. PubMed ID: 34914412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.
    Senaldi MSG; Titone DA; Johns BT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Jun; 76(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 35143239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for item-level variance in recognition memory: Comparing word frequency and contextual diversity.
    Johns BT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1013-1032. PubMed ID: 34811640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic diversity is best measured with unscaled vectors: Reply to Cevoli, Watkins and Rastle (2020).
    Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1688-1700. PubMed ID: 34591284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic context effects when naming Japanese kanji, but not Chinese hànzì.
    Verdonschot RG; La Heij W; Schiller NO
    Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 20338551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing word frequency, semantic diversity, and semantic distinctiveness in lexical organization.
    Chang M; Jones MN; Johns BT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 37307352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural systems for word meaning modulated by semantic ambiguity.
    Chan AH; Liu HL; Yip V; Fox PT; Gao JH; Tan LH
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1128-33. PubMed ID: 15219584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probing Lexical Ambiguity in Chinese Characters via Their Word Formations: Convergence of Perceived and Computed Metrics.
    Wang T; Xu X; Xie X; Ng ML
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Nov; 47(11):e13379. PubMed ID: 37988245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling contextual diversity: Communicative need as a lexical organizer.
    Johns BT
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Apr; 128(3):525-557. PubMed ID: 33570977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.