BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29126390)

  • 1. Reference-guided de novo assembly approach improves genome reconstruction for related species.
    Lischer HEL; Shimizu KK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29126390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
    Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AlignGraph: algorithm for secondary de novo genome assembly guided by closely related references.
    Bao E; Jiang T; Girke T
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):i319-i328. PubMed ID: 24932000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. dnAQET: a framework to compute a consolidated metric for benchmarking quality of de novo assemblies.
    Yavas G; Hong H; Xiao W
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):706. PubMed ID: 31510940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
    Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MaGuS: a tool for quality assessment and scaffolding of genome assemblies with Whole Genome Profiling™ Data.
    Madoui MA; Dossat C; d'Agata L; van Oeveren J; van der Vossen E; Aury JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():115. PubMed ID: 26936254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A De Novo Genome Sequence Assembly of the Arabidopsis thaliana Accession Niederzenz-1 Displays Presence/Absence Variation and Strong Synteny.
    Pucker B; Holtgräwe D; Rosleff Sörensen T; Stracke R; Viehöver P; Weisshaar B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164321. PubMed ID: 27711162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SMRT sequencing only de novo assembly of the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) chloroplast genome.
    Stadermann KB; Weisshaar B; Holtgräwe D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):295. PubMed ID: 26377912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of three assembly strategies for a heterozygous seedless grapevine genome assembly.
    Patel S; Lu Z; Jin X; Swaminathan P; Zeng E; Fennell AY
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29343235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies.
    Roach MJ; Schmidt SA; Borneman AR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):460. PubMed ID: 30497373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. De novo likelihood-based measures for comparing genome assemblies.
    Ghodsi M; Hill CM; Astrovskaya I; Lin H; Sommer DD; Koren S; Pop M
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 Aug; 6():334. PubMed ID: 23965294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two low coverage bird genomes and a comparison of reference-guided versus de novo genome assemblies.
    Card DC; Schield DR; Reyes-Velasco J; Fujita MK; Andrew AL; Oyler-McCance SJ; Fike JA; Tomback DF; Ruggiero RP; Castoe TA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106649. PubMed ID: 25192061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
    Wang S; Gribskov M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A linked-read approach to museomics: Higher quality de novo genome assemblies from degraded tissues.
    Colella JP; Tigano A; MacManes MD
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jul; 20(4):856-870. PubMed ID: 32153100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SRAssembler: Selective Recursive local Assembly of homologous genomic regions.
    McCarthy TW; Chou HC; Brendel VP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 31266441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The complex task of choosing a de novo assembly: lessons from fungal genomes.
    Gallo JE; Muñoz JF; Misas E; McEwen JG; Clay OK
    Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Dec; 53 Pt A():97-107. PubMed ID: 25262360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage.
    Chakraborty M; Baldwin-Brown JG; Long AD; Emerson JJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(19):e147. PubMed ID: 27458204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring structural variation and gene family architecture with De Novo assemblies of 15 Medicago genomes.
    Zhou P; Silverstein KA; Ramaraj T; Guhlin J; Denny R; Liu J; Farmer AD; Steele KP; Stupar RM; Miller JR; Tiffin P; Mudge J; Young ND
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):261. PubMed ID: 28347275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Illumina TruSeq synthetic long-reads empower de novo assembly and resolve complex, highly-repetitive transposable elements.
    McCoy RC; Taylor RW; Blauwkamp TA; Kelley JL; Kertesz M; Pushkarev D; Petrov DA; Fiston-Lavier AS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106689. PubMed ID: 25188499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RepAHR: an improved approach for de novo repeat identification by assembly of the high-frequency reads.
    Liao X; Gao X; Zhang X; Wu FX; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):463. PubMed ID: 33076827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.