215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29127153)
1. Analysis of unsuccessful intubations in neonates using videolaryngoscopy recordings.
O'Shea JE; Loganathan P; Thio M; Kamlin COF; Davis PG
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2018 Sep; 103(5):F408-F412. PubMed ID: 29127153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).
Abdelgadir IS; Phillips RS; Singh D; Moncreiff MP; Lumsden JL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011413. PubMed ID: 28539007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.
Lingappan K; Arnold JL; Fernandes CJ; Pammi M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD009975. PubMed ID: 29862490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins.
Eismann H; Sieg L; Etti N; Friedrich L; Schröter C; Mommsen P; Krettek C; Zeckey C
Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):27. PubMed ID: 28797305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variables associated with successful intubation attempts using video laryngoscopy: a preliminary report in a helicopter emergency medical service.
Carlson JN; Quintero J; Guyette FX; Callaway CW; Menegazzi JJ
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 22191806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study.
Ray DC; Billington C; Kearns PK; Kirkbride R; Mackintosh K; Reeve CS; Robinson N; Stewart CJ; Trudeau T
Anaesthesia; 2009 Nov; 64(11):1207-10. PubMed ID: 19825056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in simulated pediatric intubation.
Donoghue AJ; Ades AM; Nishisaki A; Deutsch ES
Ann Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 61(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 23083969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trainees success rates with intubation to suction meconium at birth.
Robinson MÈ; Diaz I; Barrowman NJ; Huneault-Purney N; Lemyre B; Rouvinez-Bouali N
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2018 Sep; 103(5):F413-F416. PubMed ID: 29636384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.
Gu Y; Robert J; Kovacs G; Milne AD; Morris I; Hung O; MacQuarrie K; Mackinnon S; Adam Law J
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 63(8):928-37. PubMed ID: 27090535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Videolaryngoscopy to Teach Neonatal Intubation: A Randomized Trial.
O'Shea JE; Thio M; Kamlin CO; McGrory L; Wong C; John J; Roberts C; Kuschel C; Davis PG
Pediatrics; 2015 Nov; 136(5):912-9. PubMed ID: 26482669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the novel GlideScope Groove videolaryngoscope with conventional videolaryngoscopy: a randomized mannequin study of novice providers.
Tung A; Griesdale DE
J Clin Anesth; 2013 Dec; 25(8):644-50. PubMed ID: 24095892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope?
Cirilla DJ; Ngo J; Vaisman V; Daly C; Ata A; Sandison M; Roberts K
J Clin Anesth; 2015 Dec; 27(8):646-51. PubMed ID: 26277231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional and videolaryngoscopy blades in neonates.
Kirolos S; O'Shea JE
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2020 Jan; 105(1):94-97. PubMed ID: 30606750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NewB for newbies: a randomized control trial training housestaff to perform neonatal intubation with direct and videolaryngoscopy.
Koele-Schmidt L; Vasquez MM
Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 Apr; 26(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 26714736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal videolaryngoscopy as a teaching aid: the trainees' perspective.
O'Shea JE; Kirolos S; Thio M; Kamlin COF; Davis PG
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2021 Mar; 106(2):168-171. PubMed ID: 32963087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining and developing expertise in tracheal intubation using a GlideScope(®) for anaesthetists with expertise in Macintosh direct laryngoscopy: an in-vivo longitudinal study.
Cortellazzi P; Caldiroli D; Byrne A; Sommariva A; Orena EF; Tramacere I
Anaesthesia; 2015 Mar; 70(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25271442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
