216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29127153)
21. Impact of Videolaryngoscopy Expertise on First-Attempt Intubation Success in Critically Ill Patients.
Amalric M; Larcher R; Brunot V; Garnier F; De Jong A; Moulaire Rigollet V; Corne P; Klouche K; Jung B
Crit Care Med; 2020 Oct; 48(10):e889-e896. PubMed ID: 32769622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric intubation: A meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials.
Hu X; Jin Y; Li J; Xin J; Yang Z
J Clin Anesth; 2020 Nov; 66():109968. PubMed ID: 32645564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation.
Cavus E; Neumann T; Doerges V; Moeller T; Scharf E; Wagner K; Bein B; Serocki G
Anesth Analg; 2011 Feb; 112(2):382-5. PubMed ID: 21156978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A
Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inverse intubation in entrapped trauma casualties: a simulator based, randomised cross-over comparison of direct, indirect and video laryngoscopy.
Schober P; Krage R; van Groeningen D; Loer SA; Schwarte LA
Emerg Med J; 2014 Dec; 31(12):959-63. PubMed ID: 24005641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in the management of unexpected failed intubations.
Kilicaslan A; Topal A; Tavlan A; Erol A; Otelcioglu S
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 24565390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics.
Yun BJ; Brown CA; Grazioso CJ; Pozner CN; Raja AS
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(3):442-5. PubMed ID: 24460509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists.
Walker L; Brampton W; Halai M; Hoy C; Lee E; Scott I; McLernon DJ
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 103(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19605408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Transfer of skills and comparison of performance between king vision® video laryngoscope and macintosh blade following an AHA airway management course.
Wolf LE; Aguirre JA; Vogt C; Keller C; Borgeat A; Bruppacher HR
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 28125969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Flex-It stylet is less effective than a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation using the GlideScope.
Turkstra TP; Jones PM; Ower KM; Gros ML
Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):1856-9. PubMed ID: 19923515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.
Noppens RR; Möbus S; Heid F; Schmidtmann I; Werner C; Piepho T
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):716-20. PubMed ID: 20528841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
Tremblay MH; Williams S; Robitaille A; Drolet P
Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1495-500, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18420866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Difficult airway management: comparison of the Bullard laryngoscope with the video-optical intubation stylet.
Weiss M; Schwarz U; Gerber AC
Can J Anaesth; 2000 Mar; 47(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 10730742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Parker Flex-It intubation stylet versus a 90-degree curved stylet during intubation with the McGrath videolaryngoscope performed by novices: a manikin study with 5 airway scenarios.
Reus E; Grundmann U; Liening K; Wrobel M
J Clin Anesth; 2013 Dec; 25(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 23988799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study.
Vargas M; Pastore A; Aloj F; Laffey JG; Servillo G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28219331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade.
Stroumpoulis K; Pagoulatou A; Violari M; Ikonomou I; Kalantzi N; Kastrinaki K; Xanthos T; Michaloliakou C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Mar; 26(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 19237983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Kepler intubation system.
Hemmerling TM; Wehbe M; Zaouter C; Taddei R; Morse J
Anesth Analg; 2012 Mar; 114(3):590-4. PubMed ID: 22190550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
