889 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128128)
1. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations.
Oyar P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 24560984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations.
Dal Piva AMO; Tribst JPM; Borges ALS; Souza ROAE; Bottino MA
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1342-1350. PubMed ID: 29934125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
