890 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128128)
21. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
Desai PD; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.
Soares LM; Razaghy M; Magne P
Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 29366492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of novel "super-closed" sandwich composite resin restorations in large MOD defects.
Magne P; Silva S; Andrada Md; Maia H
Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26835525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stress-strain Analysis of Premolars With Non-carious Cervical Lesions: Influence of Restorative Material, Loading Direction and Mechanical Fatigue.
Machado AC; Soares CJ; Reis BR; Bicalho AA; Raposo L; Soares PV
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):253-265. PubMed ID: 28467256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of the lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restorations by multilayer technique.
Sun T; Shao B; Liu Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Apr; 202():105995. PubMed ID: 33592326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis.
Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A
Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of differing thickness and mechanical properties of cement on the stress levels and distributions in a three-unit zirconia fixed prosthesis by FEA.
Wimmer T; Erdelt KJ; Raith S; Schneider JM; Stawarczyk B; Beuer F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 24417273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Susceptibility of restorations and adjacent enamel/dentine to erosion under different salivary flow conditions.
Alghilan MA; Cook NB; Platt JA; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1476-82. PubMed ID: 26476416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical performance of resin composite on dental tissue restoration: A finite element analysis.
Ouldyerou A; Mehboob H; Mehboob A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Mukdadi OM; Barsoum I; Junaedi H
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295582. PubMed ID: 38128035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
