These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128150)
1. Structural and ultrastructural analyses of bone regeneration in rabbit cranial osteotomy: Piezosurgery versus traditional osteotomes. Anesi A; Ferretti M; Cavani F; Salvatori R; Bianchi M; Russo A; Chiarini L; Palumbo C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 46(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 29128150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micromorphometrical analyses of five different ultrasonic osteotomy devices at the rabbit skull. Hollstein S; Hoffmann E; Vogel J; Heyroth F; Prochnow N; Maurer P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):713-718. PubMed ID: 21488969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamics of bone healing after osteotomy with piezosurgery or conventional drilling - histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis. Esteves JC; Marcantonio E; de Souza Faloni AP; Rocha FR; Marcantonio RA; Wilk K; Intini G J Transl Med; 2013 Sep; 11():221. PubMed ID: 24053147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Light microscopic examination of rabbit skulls following conventional and Piezosurgery osteotomy]. Maurer P; Kriwalsky MS; Block Veras R; Brandt J; Heiss C Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Oct; 52(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 17915997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wound healing of osteotomy defects prepared with piezo or conventional surgical instruments: a pilot study in rabbits. Ma L; Mattheos N; Sun Y; Liu XL; Yip Chui Y; Lang NP J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 Aug; 6(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 24850771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healing of osteotomy sites applying either piezosurgery or two conventional saw blades: a pilot study in rabbits. Ma L; Stübinger S; Liu XL; Schneider UA; Lang NP Int Orthop; 2013 Aug; 37(8):1597-603. PubMed ID: 23793460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Osteotomy Instruments in the Comparison of Three Different Bone Harvesting Methods: An Istomorphometric, Phonometric, and Chronometric Evaluation. Valente NA; Cosma L; Nocca G; D'Addona A; Lajolo C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1070–1077. PubMed ID: 30742138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temperature and time variations during osteotomies performed with different piezosurgical devices: an in vitro study. Delgado-Ruiz RA; Sacks D; Palermo A; Calvo-Guirado JL; Perez-Albacete C; Romanos GE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 26439590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteotomy speed, heat development, and bone structure influence by various piezoelectric systems-an in vitro study. Noetzel N; Fienitz T; Kreppel M; Zirk M; Safi AF; Rothamel D Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4029-4041. PubMed ID: 30826919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental and histological investigations of the bone using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy. Heinemann F; Hasan I; Kunert-Keil C; Götz W; Gedrange T; Spassov A; Schweppe J; Gredes T Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 22056295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental Comparison of the Performance of Cutting Bone and Soft Tissue between Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments. Otake Y; Nakamura M; Henmi A; Takahashi T; Sasano Y Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17154. PubMed ID: 30464184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of piezosurgery, percutaneous osteotomy, and endonasal continuous osteotomy techniques with a caprine skull model. Kurt Yazar S; Serin M; Rakici IT; Sirvan SS; Irmak F; Yazar M J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jan; 72(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 30243555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Cell Viability Immediately After Osteotomy for Implants With Drills and Piezosurgery: Immunohistochemistry Analysis. Pereira CCS; Batista FRS; Jacob RGM; Nogueira LM; Carvalho ACGS; Gealh WC; Garcia-Júnior IR; Okamoto R J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 29(6):1578-1582. PubMed ID: 29742566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspects of bone healing and bone substitute incorporation. An experimental study in rabbit skull bone defects. Isaksson S Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 84():1-46. PubMed ID: 1334579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of immediate cell viability and repair of osteotomies for implants using drills and piezosurgery. A randomized, prospective, and controlled rabbit study. Ponzoni D; Martins FEPB; Conforte JJ; Egas LS; Tonini KR; de Carvalho PSP Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 22(3):250-260. PubMed ID: 32291960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Bone Healing After Osteotomies Prepared With Er:YAG Laser in Contact and Noncontact Modes and Piezosurgery--An Animal Study. Gabrić D; Blašković M; Gjorgijevska E; Mladenov M; Tašič B; Jurič IB; Ban T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26428612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types. Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone Healing Following Different Types of Osteotomy: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Three-Dimensional SEM Analyses. Blaskovic M; Gabrić D; Coleman NJ; Slipper IJ; Mladenov M; Gjorgievska E Microsc Microanal; 2016 Dec; 22(6):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 27998364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy in cranioplasty with fronto-orbital advancement. Martini M; Röhrig A; Reich RH; Messing-Jünger M J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 45(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 28108236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Piezoelectric osteotomy for the placement of titanium implants in rabbits: histomorphometry study. Kfouri Fde Á; Duailibi MT; Bretos JL; Carvalho AB; Pallos D; Duailibi SE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1182-8. PubMed ID: 23834351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]