These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinding of reviewers and authors. Chapman S Aust N Z J Public Health; 2003; 27(3):358. PubMed ID: 14705293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanding Group Peer Review: A Proposal for Medical Education Scholarship. Dumenco L; Engle DL; Goodell K; Nagler A; Ovitsh RK; Whicker SA Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 27680319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement. Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ["Predatory publishers"]. Olsson H Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Authors should publish their raw data. Nagelkerke NJ; Bernsen RM; Rizk DE Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1387-90. PubMed ID: 17876487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Valuing peer reviewers: accreditation for reviewers. Ahmed S Clin Exp Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 45(4):407-408. PubMed ID: 31814139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]