1164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128577)
21. Preoperative MRI PI-RADS scores are associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology.
Pockros B; Stensland KD; Parries M; Frankenberger E; Canes D; Moinzadeh A
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 34878175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.
Liauw SL; Pitroda SP; Eggener SE; Stadler WM; Pelizzari CA; Vannier MW; Oto A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 22717242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.
Narita S; Mitsuzuka K; Tsuchiya N; Koie T; Kawamura S; Ohyama C; Tochigi T; Yamaguchi T; Arai Y; Habuchi T;
Int J Urol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1029-35. PubMed ID: 26290306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive factors for short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Kanehira M; Takata R; Ishii S; Ito A; Ikarashi D; Matsuura T; Kato Y; Obara W
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Sep; 24(9):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30972506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Heterogeneity of Outcomes in D'Amico Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: Influence of Primary and Secondary Gleason Score.
Pollard ME; Hobbs AR; Kwon YS; Katsigeorgis M; Lavery HJ; Levinson A; Bernstein AN; Collingwood SA; Hall SJ; Jazayeri SB; Samadi DB
Oncol Res Treat; 2017; 40(9):508-514. PubMed ID: 28796995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pathological Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concordance at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Local Recurrence following Partial Ablation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.
Thompson JE; Sridhar AN; Tan WS; Freeman A; Haider A; Allen C; Moore CM; Orczyk C; Mazzon G; Khetrapal P; Shaw G; Rajan P; Mohammed A; Briggs TP; Nathan S; Kelly JD; Sooriakumaran P
J Urol; 2019 Jun; 201(6):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 30730409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preoperative Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Structured Report Informs Risk for Positive Apical Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy.
Costa DN; Meng X; Tverye A; Bagrodia A; Recchimuzzi DZ; Xi Y; Arraj P; Shah RB; Subramanian N; de Leon AD; Roehrborn CG; Rofsky NM; Chen H; Pedrosa I
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 47(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 35995580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tumor contact with prostate capsule on magnetic resonance imaging: A potential biomarker for staging and prognosis.
Kongnyuy M; Sidana A; George AK; Muthigi A; Iyer A; Ho R; Chelluri R; Mertan F; Frye TP; Su D; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):30.e1-30.e8. PubMed ID: 27567248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Three Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Performance with and without Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection, PI-RADS™ version 2 Category and Staging with Whole Mount Histopathology Correlation.
Mirak SA; Shakeri S; Bajgiran AM; Felker ER; Sung KH; Asvadi NH; Khoshnoodi P; Markovic D; Ponzini D; Ahuja P; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Lu D; Raman SS
J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30273608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
