These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128582)

  • 1. Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.
    Lux MP; Nabieva N; Hildebrandt T; Rebscher H; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU; Schrauder MG
    Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():89-98. PubMed ID: 29128582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic Impact of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in France.
    Katz G; Romano O; Foa C; Vataire AL; Chantelard JV; Hervé R; Barletta H; Durieux A; Martin JP; Salmon R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128880. PubMed ID: 26086912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The budget impact of utilizing the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test from a US healthcare payer perspective.
    Berdunov V; Laws E; Cuyun Carter G; Luo R; Russell C; Campbell S; Force J; Abdou Y
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):973-990. PubMed ID: 37466220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cost-consequence model of using the 21-gene assay to identify patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands.
    Simons MJHG; Machielsen PM; Spoorendonk JA; Ignacio T; Drost PB; Jacobs T; de Jongh FE
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):445-454. PubMed ID: 38436289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Budget impact of the Oncotype DX® test compared to other gene expression tests in patients with early breast cancer in Germany.
    Lux MP; Minartz C; Müller-Huesmann H; Sandor MF; Herrmann KH; Radeck-Knorre S; Neubauer AS
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2022; 31():100519. PubMed ID: 35093682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(10):1-234. PubMed ID: 32284770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.
    Harnan S; Tappenden P; Cooper K; Stevens J; Bessey A; Rafia R; Ward S; Wong R; Stein RC; Brown J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(30):1-328. PubMed ID: 31264581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
    Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic profile of breast cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis from the Spanish National Healthcare System perspective.
    Seguí MÁ; Crespo C; Cortés J; Lluch A; Brosa M; Becerra V; Chiavenna SM; Gracia A
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Dec; 14(6):889-99. PubMed ID: 25213317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncotype DX
    Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Fiedler M; Heil J; Golatta M; Dinkic C; Hennigs A; Schott S; Ernst V; Koch T; Sohn C; Brucker C; Rom J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):443-447. PubMed ID: 29236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Budget Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score
    Lux MP; Minartz C; Müller-Huesmann H; Sandor MF; Radeck-Knorre S; Neubauer AS
    Breast Care (Basel); 2024 Feb; 19(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 38384494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
    Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
    Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
    Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
    Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.
    Loncaster J; Armstrong A; Howell S; Wilson G; Welch R; Chittalia A; Valentine WJ; Bundred NJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 43(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28111076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population-Based Study to Determine the Health System Costs of Using the 21-Gene Assay.
    Mittmann N; Earle CC; Cheng SY; Julian JA; Rahman F; Seung SJ; Levine MN
    J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 36(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 29193984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region].
    Nerich V; Curtit E; Bazan F; Montcuquet P; Villanueva C; Chaigneau L; Cals L; Méneveau N; Dobi E; Altmotlak H; Algros MP; Choulot MJ; Nallet G; Limat S; Mansion S; Pivot X
    Bull Cancer; 2014; 101(7-8):681-9. PubMed ID: 25091650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prognostic gene expression signature-based stratification of early breast cancer patients.
    Blank PR; Filipits M; Dubsky P; Gutzwiller F; Lux MP; Brase JC; Weber KE; Rudas M; Greil R; Loibl S; Szucs TD; Kronenwett R; Schwenkglenks M; Gnant M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Feb; 33(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 25404424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the U.K.
    Holt S; Bertelli G; Humphreys I; Valentine W; Durrani S; Pudney D; Rolles M; Moe M; Khawaja S; Sharaiha Y; Brinkworth E; Whelan S; Jones S; Bennett H; Phillips CJ
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(11):2250-8. PubMed ID: 23695023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does the use of Oncotype DX tumor gene expression profiling to guide treatment decisions improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?
    Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group*
    Genet Med; 2016 Aug; 18(8):770-9. PubMed ID: 26681310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
    Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.