BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128736)

  • 1. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task.
    Leiker AM; Bruzi AT; Miller MW; Nelson M; Wegman R; Lohse KR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2016 Oct; 49():326-35. PubMed ID: 27551820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.
    Lewthwaite R; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R; Wulf G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1383-8. PubMed ID: 25732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autonomy support and reduced feedback frequency have trivial effects on learning and performance of a golf putting task.
    McKay B; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102612. PubMed ID: 32452429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R; Cardozo P; Chiviacowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):824-831. PubMed ID: 28056637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between motor ability and skill learning in children: Application of implicit and explicit approaches.
    Maxwell JP; Capio CM; Masters RS
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 May; 17(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 28038502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory.
    Ghorbani S
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 30654726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autonomy Support via Instructionally Irrelevant Choice Not Beneficial for Motor Performance or Learning.
    McKay B; Ste-Marie DM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2022 Mar; 93(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 32854605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback.
    Barros JAC; Yantha ZD; Carter MJ; Hussien J; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():182-198. PubMed ID: 30580207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.
    Grand KF; Bruzi AT; Dyke FB; Godwin MM; Leiker AM; Thompson AG; Buchanan TL; Miller MW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():23-32. PubMed ID: 26163375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exercising choice over feedback schedules during practice is not advantageous for motor learning.
    St Germain L; McKay B; Poskus A; Williams A; Leshchyshen O; Feldman S; Cashaback JGA; Carter MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Apr; 30(2):621-633. PubMed ID: 36163607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
    Simpson T; Cronin L; Ellison P; Carnegie E; Marchant D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102651. PubMed ID: 32721370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of errorless learning for serial reaction time performance in Alzheimer's disease.
    Schmitz X; Bier N; Joubert S; Lejeune C; Salmon E; Rouleau I; Meulemans T
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2014; 39(2):287-300. PubMed ID: 24157724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Apr; 40():176-84. PubMed ID: 25589021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the Role of Error in Motor Learning.
    Lee TD; Eliasz KL; Gonzalez D; Alguire K; Ding K; Dhaliwal C
    J Mot Behav; 2016; 48(2):99-115. PubMed ID: 26047067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1382-1414. PubMed ID: 26833314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Choice on Motor Learning for Learners With Different Levels of Intrinsic Motivation.
    Ikudome S; Kou K; Ogasa K; Mori S; Nakamoto H
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):159-166. PubMed ID: 31189427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Cardozo PL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Oct; 37():12-20. PubMed ID: 25046402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lassoing Skill Through Learner Choice.
    Wulf G; Iwatsuki T; Machin B; Kellogg J; Copeland C; Lewthwaite R
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(3):285-292. PubMed ID: 28854061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.
    Carter MJ; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1879-1888. PubMed ID: 28224481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 61.