152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29128994)
1. Radiologists' preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.
Spilseth B; Margolis DJ; Ghai S; Patel NU; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1807-1812. PubMed ID: 29128994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Radiologists' and Urologists' Opinions Regarding Prostate MRI Reporting: Results From a Survey of Specialty Societies.
Spilseth B; Ghai S; Patel NU; Taneja SS; Margolis DJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 29064758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Prostate MRI Interpretation Experience on PPV Using PI-RADS Version 2: A 6-Year Assessment Among Eight Fellowship-Trained Radiologists.
Salka BR; Shankar PR; Troost JP; Khalatbari S; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 35319914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
Meier-Schroers M; Kukuk G; Wolter K; Decker G; Fischer S; Marx C; Traeber F; Sprinkart AM; Block W; Schild HH; Willinek W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 85(7):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27235878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Oelers C; Dietzel F; Sawicki LM; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():192-197. PubMed ID: 28583633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging Facilities' Adherence to PI-RADS v2 Minimum Technical Standards for the Performance of Prostate MRI.
Esses SJ; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Acad Radiol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 29107458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: interpretation using the PI-RADS V2.
Torregrosa Andrés A; Otero García M; Sineiro Galiñanes M
Radiologia; 2017; 59(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28012730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.
Westphalen AC; McCulloch CE; Anaokar JM; Arora S; Barashi NS; Barentsz JO; Bathala TK; Bittencourt LK; Booker MT; Braxton VG; Carroll PR; Casalino DD; Chang SD; Coakley FV; Dhatt R; Eberhardt SC; Foster BR; Froemming AT; Fütterer JJ; Ganeshan DM; Gertner MR; Mankowski Gettle L; Ghai S; Gupta RT; Hahn ME; Houshyar R; Kim C; Kim CK; Lall C; Margolis DJA; McRae SE; Oto A; Parsons RB; Patel NU; Pinto PA; Polascik TJ; Spilseth B; Starcevich JB; Tammisetti VS; Taneja SS; Turkbey B; Verma S; Ward JF; Warlick CA; Weinberger AR; Yu J; Zagoria RJ; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 32315265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.
Chang SD; Margolis DJA; Turkbey B; Arnold AA; Verma S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):952-959. PubMed ID: 33566638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report.
Steiger P; Thoeny HC
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Apr; 16():9. PubMed ID: 27067275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review.
Hassanzadeh E; Glazer DI; Dunne RM; Fennessy FM; Harisinghani MG; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jan; 42(1):278-289. PubMed ID: 27522352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) v. 2 assessment categories 4 and 5 compared to histopathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Lim RS; Breau RH; Flood TA; Krishna S; Morash C; Shabana WM; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):257-266. PubMed ID: 27807914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
