These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29129123)
41. The missing voices in the conscientious objection debate: British service users' experiences of conscientious objection to abortion. Self B; Maxwell C; Fleming V BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Aug; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 37605173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Conscientious Objection in Medicine: Making it Public. Ben-Moshe N HEC Forum; 2021 Sep; 33(3):269-289. PubMed ID: 32221817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals. Nieminen P; Lappalainen S; Ristimäki P; Myllykangas M; Mustonen AM BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 16():17. PubMed ID: 25885698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influencers of ethical beliefs and the impact on moral distress and conscientious objection. Davis S; Schrader V; Belcheir MJ Nurs Ethics; 2012 Nov; 19(6):738-49. PubMed ID: 22736753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion. Lertxundi R; Ibarrondo O; Merki-Feld GS; Rey-Novoa M; Rowlands S; Mar J Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Jun; 21(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 26986562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. No conscientious objection without normative justification: A reply. Blackshaw BP Bioethics; 2019 May; 33(4):522-523. PubMed ID: 30657604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Institutional objection to abortion: A mixed-methods narrative review. Merner B; Haining CM; Willmott L; Savulescu J; Keogh LA Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231152373. PubMed ID: 36785871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Conscientious objection to termination of pregnancy: the competing rights of patients and nurses. Kane R J Nurs Manag; 2009 Nov; 17(7):907-12. PubMed ID: 19793248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Conscientious objection in the matter of abortion]. Serrano Gil A; García Casado ML Rev Enferm; 1992 Mar; 15(163):45-6. PubMed ID: 1565971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law. Adenitire JO J Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 43(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 26992410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The limits of conscientious objection to abortion in the developing world. van Bogaert LJ Dev World Bioeth; 2002 Dec; 2(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 12870481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. Strickland SL J Med Ethics; 2012 Jan; 38(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 21768618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Medical and midwifery students' views on the use of conscientious objection in abortion care, following legal reform in Chile: a cross-sectional study. Biggs MA; Casas L; Ramm A; Baba CF; Correa SP BMC Med Ethics; 2020 May; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 32448300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A narrative literature review of the impact of conscientious objection by health professionals on women's access to abortion worldwide 2013-2021. Davis JM; Haining CM; Keogh LA Glob Public Health; 2022; 17(9):2190-2205. PubMed ID: 35129083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine. Ben-Moshe N J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):404-410. PubMed ID: 31221763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Conscientious objection in the clinical setting. A proposal for its appropriate use]. Couceiro A; Seoane JA; Hernando P Rev Calid Asist; 2011; 26(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 21543247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]