These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29130999)

  • 1. Selection of Character Coding Method Is Not Phylogenetically Neutral: A Test Case Using Hominoids.
    Worthington S
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 2017; 88(5):385-400. PubMed ID: 29130999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa.
    Strait DS; Grine FE
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Dec; 47(6):399-452. PubMed ID: 15566946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Homoplasy and the early hominid masticatory system: inferences from analyses of extant hominoids and papionins.
    Collard M; Wood B
    J Hum Evol; 2001 Sep; 41(3):167-94. PubMed ID: 11534998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphometric variation in the hominoid orbital aperture: a case study with implications for the use of variable characters in Miocene catarrhine systematics.
    Seiffert ER; Kappelman J
    J Hum Evol; 2001 Apr; 40(4):301-18. PubMed ID: 11312583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic signal in bone microstructure of sauropsids.
    Cubo J; Ponton F; Laurin M; de Margerie E; Castanet J
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):562-74. PubMed ID: 16085575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing the number of discrete character states for continuous characters generates well-resolved trees that do not reflect phylogeny.
    Bardin J; Rouget I; Yacobucci MM; Cecca F
    Integr Zool; 2014 Aug; 9(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 24148350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 28945906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When Homoplasy Is Not Homoplasy: Dissecting Trait Evolution by Contrasting Composite and Reductive Coding.
    Torres-Montúfar A; Borsch T; Ochoterena H
    Syst Biol; 2018 May; 67(3):543-551. PubMed ID: 28645204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.
    Cummins CA; McInerney JO
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):833-44. PubMed ID: 21804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling.
    Hill RV
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):530-47. PubMed ID: 16085573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodilian evolution.
    Sadleir RW; Makovicky PJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1578-96. PubMed ID: 18808440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A methodological investigation of hominoid craniodental morphology and phylogenetics.
    Bjarnason A; Chamberlain AT; Lockwood CA
    J Hum Evol; 2011 Jan; 60(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 20951408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm for Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis with Inapplicable Data.
    Brazeau MD; Guillerme T; Smith MR
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):619-631. PubMed ID: 30535172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis.
    Swiderski DL; Zelditch ML; Fink WL
    Syst Biol; 1998 Sep; 47(3):508-19. PubMed ID: 12066691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Covariance structure in the skull of Catarrhini: a case of pattern stasis and magnitude evolution.
    de Oliveira FB; Porto A; Marroig G
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Apr; 56(4):417-30. PubMed ID: 19362730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First partial face and upper dentition of the Middle Miocene hominoid Dryopithecus fontani from Abocador de Can Mata (Vallès-Penedès Basin, Catalonia, NE Spain): taxonomic and phylogenetic implications.
    Moyà-Solà S; Köhler M; Alba DM; Casanovas-Vilar I; Galindo J; Robles JM; Cabrera L; Garcés M; Almécija S; Beamud E
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Jun; 139(2):126-45. PubMed ID: 19278017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of catarrhine genetic distances with pelvic and cranial morphology: implications for determining hominin phylogeny.
    von Cramon-Taubadel N; Lycett SJ
    J Hum Evol; 2014 Dec; 77():179-86. PubMed ID: 25439629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation of functional cranial components in six Anthropoidea species.
    Pucciarelli HM; Ramirez Rozzi FV; Muñe MC; Sardi ML
    Zoology (Jena); 2006; 109(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 16820284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hominin homoiology: an assessment of the impact of phenotypic plasticity on phylogenetic analyses of humans and their fossil relatives.
    Collard M; Wood B
    J Hum Evol; 2007 May; 52(5):573-84. PubMed ID: 17412395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.