BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29133000)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a Decision-Making Protocol for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis with Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Staartjes VE; Schröder ML
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e355-e361. PubMed ID: 29133000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
    Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Blumenthal C; Curran J; Benzel EC; Potter R; Magge SN; Harrington JF; Coumans JV; Ghogawala Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 23373567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Schnake KJ; Schaeren S; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16481955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
    Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sun W; Xue C; Tang XY; Feng H; Yuan F; Guo KJ; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30755227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gadjradj PS; Basilious M; Goldberg JL; Sommer F; Navarro-Ramirez R; Mykolajtchuk C; Ng AZ; Medary B; Hussain I; Härtl R
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Mar; 32(3):1054-1067. PubMed ID: 36609887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
    Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Low-grade Spondylolisthesis: What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us?
    Schär RT; Kiebach S; Raabe A; Ulrich CT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Feb; 44(4):E245-E251. PubMed ID: 30015718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Outcomes and Radiologic Changes After Microsurgical Bilateral Decompression by a Unilateral Approach in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.
    Jang JW; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Rhim SC
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):268-71. PubMed ID: 23073148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.
    Schaeren S; Broger I; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):E636-42. PubMed ID: 18708915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Computer Navigation-Assisted Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion with Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach: Initial Clinical Experience at One-Year Follow-Up.
    Zhang Y; Xu C; Zhou Y; Huang B
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():291-299. PubMed ID: 28710043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.