189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29133377)
1. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities.
Weatherall M
Postgrad Med J; 2018 Apr; 94(1110):230-235. PubMed ID: 29133377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayes' rule in diagnosis.
Bours MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():158-160. PubMed ID: 33741123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
Akobeng AK
Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.
Paulo S; Mendes S; Vizinho R; Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1187-98. PubMed ID: 15587576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology, Part 3: everyday probabilities: diagnostic tests with binary results.
Shin JJ; Stinnett S; Page J; Randolph GW
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 147(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 22588733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactive visualisation for interpreting diagnostic test accuracy study results.
Fanshawe TR; Power M; Graziadio S; Ordóñez-Mena JM; Simpson J; Allen J
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Feb; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 29367318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
Weissler AM
Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.
Hamm RM; Smith SL
J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 9673608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Importance of Conditional Probability in Diagnostic Reasoning and Clinical Decision Making: A Primer for the Eye Care Practitioner.
Sanfilippo PG; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):81-89. PubMed ID: 28102752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review on the methodology for assessing diagnostic tests.
Linnet K
Clin Chem; 1988 Jul; 34(7):1379-86. PubMed ID: 3292081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncertainty in Bayes.
Baron JA
Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8152356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.
Felli JC; Leishman DJ
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020 Sep; 105():106898. PubMed ID: 32735877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visualizing the impact of prevalence on a diagnostic test.
Rehling M
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Oct; 70(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 20645678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayes' theorem, the ROC diagram and reference values: Definition and use in clinical diagnosis.
Kallner A
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Feb; 28(1):010101. PubMed ID: 29209139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Bayes' rule in diagnostic testing: a graphical explanation.
Johnson KM
Diagnosis (Berl); 2017 Sep; 4(3):159-167. PubMed ID: 29536931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical inferences and decisions--II. Decision trees, receiver operator curves and subjective probability.
Aspinall P; Hill AR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 6709368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
