These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29133377)
41. [Sensitivity and specificity in AIDS screening system]. Kamae I; Yamamoto K Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 8051800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The interpretation of diagnostic test: a primer for physiotherapists. Davidson M Aust J Physiother; 2002; 48(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 12217073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Statistical methods in epidemiology. VIII. On the use of likelihood ratios for diagnostic testing with an application to general practice. Rigby AS; Summerton N Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):475-80. PubMed ID: 16040551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. van Randen A; Bipat S; Zwinderman AH; Ubbink DT; Stoker J; Boermeester MA Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 18682583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices]. Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Likelihood ratios increase diagnostic certainty in pulmonary embolism. Chu K; Brown AF Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Aug; 17(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 16091094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Four hundred or more participants needed for stable contingency table estimates of clinical prediction rule performance. Kent P; Boyle E; Keating JL; Albert HB; Hartvigsen J J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():137-148. PubMed ID: 27847252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests. Streiner DL J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 14638445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The use of diagnostic data in clinical dental practice. Oakley C; Brunette DM Dent Clin North Am; 2002 Jan; 46(1):87-115. PubMed ID: 11785748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data. Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests. Cipriani D; Fox C; Khuder S; Boudreau N J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(2):180-201. PubMed ID: 15795486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. On uncertainty in medical testing. Winkler RL; Smith JE Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15534345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Understanding Negative Predictive Value of Diagnostic Tests Used in Clinical Practice. Umberger RA; Hatfield LA; Speck PM Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2017; 36(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27902658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Diagnostic process in internal medicine: decision analysis or intuition?]. Speich R Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1997 Aug; 127(31-32):1263-79. PubMed ID: 9333937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Diagnostic accuracy]. Simundić AM Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Using Bayes theorem to estimate positive and negative predictive values for continuously and ordinally scaled diagnostic tests. Fischer F Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2021 Jun; 30(2):e1868. PubMed ID: 33650777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [All that neurologist would like to know about sensitivity, specificity and predictive values]. Gomez de la Camara A Neurologia; 2003 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():11-8. PubMed ID: 14669103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]