These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913353)

  • 1. Vacuum constriction device for management of erectile impotence.
    Witherington R
    J Urol; 1989 Feb; 141(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 2913353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive vacuum constriction device in the management of erectile dysfunction.
    el-Bahrawy M; el-Baz MA; Emam A; el-Magd MA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1995; 27(3):331-3. PubMed ID: 7591599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vacuum devices for the impotent.
    Witherington R
    J Sex Marital Ther; 1991; 17(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 1920471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suction device therapy in the management of erectile impotence.
    Witherington R
    Urol Clin North Am; 1988 Feb; 15(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 3344556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of a vacuum constrictor device to augment a partial erection following an intracavernous injection.
    Marmar JL; DeBenedictis TJ; Praiss DE
    J Urol; 1988 Nov; 140(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 3172371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a vacuum tumescence device in the management of impotence.
    Korenman SG; Viosca SP; Kaiser FE; Mooradian AD; Morley JE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 Mar; 38(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 2313002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The external vacuum device in the management of erectile dysfunction.
    Opsomer RJ; Wese FX; De Groote P; Van Cangh PJ
    Acta Urol Belg; 1997 Dec; 65(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 9497591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A study on the erectile response with the vacuum constriction device compared with intracavernous injection of a vasoactive drug].
    Wada H; Sato Y; Suzuki N; Horita H; Shibuya A; Adachi H; Tsukamoto T; Kumamoto Y; Tanda H
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Feb; 86(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 7897934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vacuum constriction devices: second-line conservative treatment for impotence.
    Gilbert HW; Gingell JC
    Br J Urol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 1638379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary experience with a vacuum constriction device (VCD) as a treatment for impotence.
    Cooper AJ
    J Psychosom Res; 1987; 31(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 3625595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vacuum constriction devices in erectile dysfunction: acceptance and effectiveness in patients with impotence of organic or mixed aetiology.
    Vrijhof HJ; Delaere KP
    Br J Urol; 1994 Jul; 74(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 8044504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective measurement of the effectiveness, therapeutic success and dynamic mechanisms of the vacuum device.
    Bosshardt RJ; Farwerk R; Sikora R; Sohn M; Jakse G
    Br J Urol; 1995 Jun; 75(6):786-91. PubMed ID: 7613837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new vacuum device as alternative treatment for impotence.
    Aloui R; Iwaz J; Kokkidis MJ; Lavoisier P
    Br J Urol; 1992 Dec; 70(6):652-5. PubMed ID: 1486393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vacuum tumescence devices: the role of papaverine in the selection of patients.
    Broderick GA; Allen G; McClure RD
    J Urol; 1991 Feb; 145(2):284-6. PubMed ID: 1988719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treating erectile dysfunction with a vacuum tumescence device: a retrospective analysis of acceptance and satisfaction.
    Baltaci S; Aydos K; Kosar A; Anafarta K
    Br J Urol; 1995 Dec; 76(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 8535721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the "Correctaid" device in the management of impotence.
    Asopa R; Williams G
    Br J Urol; 1989 May; 63(5):546-7. PubMed ID: 2731013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Follow-up of vacuum and nonvacuum constriction devices as treatments for erectile dysfunction.
    Schuetz-Mueller D; Tiefer L; Melman A
    J Sex Marital Ther; 1995; 21(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 8789504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient acceptance of and satisfaction with an external negative pressure device for impotence.
    Sidi AA; Becher EF; Zhang G; Lewis JH
    J Urol; 1990 Nov; 144(5):1154-6. PubMed ID: 2231889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [External devices: for which patients?].
    Bellorofonte C; Dell'Acqua S; Mastromarino G; Tombolini P; Ruoppolo M; Zaatar C
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1995 Dec; 67(5):293-8. PubMed ID: 8589742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results with vacuum constriction device.
    Cookson MS; Nadig PW
    J Urol; 1993 Feb; 149(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8426404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.