BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29133831)

  • 1. Protein-Ligand Blind Docking Using QuickVina-W With Inter-Process Spatio-Temporal Integration.
    Hassan NM; Alhossary AA; Mu Y; Kwoh CK
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15451. PubMed ID: 29133831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast, accurate, and reliable molecular docking with QuickVina 2.
    Alhossary A; Handoko SD; Mu Y; Kwoh CK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2214-6. PubMed ID: 25717194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vina-GPU 2.0: Further Accelerating AutoDock Vina and Its Derivatives with Graphics Processing Units.
    Ding J; Tang S; Mei Z; Wang L; Huang Q; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(7):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 36941232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QuickVina: accelerating AutoDock Vina using gradient-based heuristics for global optimization.
    Handoko SD; Ouyang X; Su CT; Kwoh CK; Ong YS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(5):1266-72. PubMed ID: 22641710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GWOVina: A grey wolf optimization approach to rigid and flexible receptor docking.
    Wong KM; Tai HK; Siu SWI
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2021 Jan; 97(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 32679606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. InstaDock: A single-click graphical user interface for molecular docking-based virtual high-throughput screening.
    Mohammad T; Mathur Y; Hassan MI
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33105480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculating an optimal box size for ligand docking and virtual screening against experimental and predicted binding pockets.
    Feinstein WP; Brylinski M
    J Cheminform; 2015; 7():18. PubMed ID: 26082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Differential Evolution Approach to Protein⁻Ligand Docking.
    Lin H; Siu SWI
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30326669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of AutoDock and AutoDock Vina on the CASF-2013 Benchmark.
    Gaillard T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 29989806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speed vs Accuracy: Effect on Ligand Pose Accuracy of Varying Box Size and Exhaustiveness in AutoDock Vina.
    Agarwal R; Smith JC
    Mol Inform; 2023 Feb; 42(2):e2200188. PubMed ID: 36262028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
    Ramírez D; Caballero J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27104528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FWAVina: A novel optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking based on the fireworks algorithm.
    Li J; Song Y; Li F; Zhang H; Liu W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2020 Oct; 88():107363. PubMed ID: 32861160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.