These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29134520)

  • 21. From pollutant removal to resource recovery: A bibliometric analysis of municipal wastewater research in Europe.
    Marcal J; Bishop T; Hofman J; Shen J
    Chemosphere; 2021 Dec; 284():131267. PubMed ID: 34217935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sustainable organic loading rate and energy recovery potential of mesophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Wei CH; Harb M; Amy G; Hong PY; Leiknes T
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():326-34. PubMed ID: 24926606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The application of multi-objective optimization method for activated sludge process: a review.
    Dai H; Chen W; Lu X
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(2):223-35. PubMed ID: 26819377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater treatments from 1998 to 2019.
    Mao G; Hu H; Liu X; Crittenden J; Huang N
    Environ Pollut; 2021 Apr; 275():115785. PubMed ID: 33607600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technological options for the management of biosolids.
    Wang H; Brown SL; Magesan GN; Slade AH; Quintern M; Clinton PW; Payn TW
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Jun; 15(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 18488261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Strategies for achieving energy neutrality in biological nutrient removal systems - a case study of the Slupsk WWTP (northern Poland).
    Zaborowska E; Czerwionka K; Makinia J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):727-740. PubMed ID: 28192366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comprehensive review on green buildings research: bibliometric analysis during 1998-2018.
    Li Y; Rong Y; Ahmad UM; Wang X; Zuo J; Mao G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):46196-46214. PubMed ID: 33594568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved?
    McCarty PL; Bae J; Kim J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7100-6. PubMed ID: 21749111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Economic, technical, and environmental evaluation of retrofitting scenarios in a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment system.
    Monje V; Owsianiak M; Junicke H; Kjellberg K; Gernaey KV; Flores-Alsina X
    Water Res; 2022 Sep; 223():118997. PubMed ID: 36029698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China.
    Zhang QH; Yang WN; Ngo HH; Guo WS; Jin PK; Dzakpasu M; Yang SJ; Wang Q; Wang XC; Ao D
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():11-22. PubMed ID: 27045705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mapping the research of energy subsidies: a bibliometric analysis.
    Wang Z; Wang Y; Peng S; Niu B; Cui C; Wu J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(28):28817-28828. PubMed ID: 31377928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Economic and environmental sustainability of submerged anaerobic MBR-based (AnMBR-based) technology as compared to aerobic-based technologies for moderate-/high-loaded urban wastewater treatment.
    Pretel R; Robles A; Ruano MV; Seco A; Ferrer J
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():45-54. PubMed ID: 26473754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modelling energy costs for different operational strategies of a large water resource recovery facility.
    Póvoa P; Oehmen A; Inocêncio P; Matos JS; Frazão A
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 May; 75(9-10):2139-2148. PubMed ID: 28498126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synergistic effect of up-flow constructed wetland and microbial fuel cell for simultaneous wastewater treatment and energy recovery.
    Oon YL; Ong SA; Ho LN; Wong YS; Dahalan FA; Oon YS; Lehl HK; Thung WE
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Mar; 203():190-7. PubMed ID: 26724550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Net energy production and emissions mitigation of domestic wastewater treatment system: a comparison of different biogas-sludge use alternatives.
    Chen S; Chen B
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():296-303. PubMed ID: 23880131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of separate urine collection on wastewater treatment systems.
    Wilsenach J; van Loosdrecht M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 12926626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of tourism-environmental degradation nexus.
    Shahbaz M; Bashir MF; Bashir MA; Shahzad L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(41):58241-58257. PubMed ID: 34110589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion.
    Schaubroeck T; De Clippeleir H; Weissenbacher N; Dewulf J; Boeckx P; Vlaeminck SE; Wett B
    Water Res; 2015 May; 74():166-79. PubMed ID: 25727156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wastewater treatment and emerging contaminants: Bibliometric analysis.
    Chen Y; Lin M; Zhuang D
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jun; 297():133932. PubMed ID: 35149018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Water Using Sewage Sludge-Based Activated Carbon Adsorption: A Review.
    Mu'azu ND; Jarrah N; Zubair M; Alagha O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Sep; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 28934127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.