These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2913453)
1. The role of expectancy in comparative judgments. Shoben EJ; Sailor KM; Wang MY Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 2913453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semantic congruity and expectancy in symbolic judgments. Banks WP; White H; Sturgill W; Mermelstein R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):560-82. PubMed ID: 6224893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. Foltz GS; Poltrock SE; Potts GR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 6235311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Congruity and the perceptual comparison task. Marschark M; Paivio A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):290-308. PubMed ID: 6453924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial attention shifts contribute to the size congruity effect. Wang A; Pan Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2795-2805. PubMed ID: 34282561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of instruction presentation mode in comparative judgments. Shaki S; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 16686118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of categorical information in processing relational attributes. Sailor KM; Shoben EJ Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):756-65. PubMed ID: 8961820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paying attention to attention: evidence for an attentional contribution to the size congruity effect. Risko EF; Maloney EA; Fugelsang JA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 23709065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited. Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The language of magnitude comparison. Matthews WJ; Dylman AS J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):510-20. PubMed ID: 23957280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitudes of coins. Fitousi D Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 21169585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The discovery and comparison of symbolic magnitudes. Chen D; Lu H; Holyoak KJ Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jun; 71():27-54. PubMed ID: 24531498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming. De Bellis F; Ferrara A; Errico D; Panico F; Sagliano L; Conson M; Trojano L Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26358123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans. Cantlon JF; Brannon EM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Nov; 102(45):16507-11. PubMed ID: 16260752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic congruity and lexical marking in symbolic comparisons: an expectancy hypothesis. Marschark M; Paivio A Mem Cognit; 1979 May; 7(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 91082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative and categorical spatial judgments in the monkey: "high" and "low". Fortes AF; Merchant H; Georgopoulos AP Anim Cogn; 2004 Apr; 7(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 15069609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional salience and judgments of bigness by three-year-old children. Bausano MK; Jeffrey WE Child Dev; 1975 Dec; 46(4):988-91. PubMed ID: 1201673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality. Falmier O; Young ME Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):473-500. PubMed ID: 18792720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]